Is Christmas Special as a Mythology? * Gaia * Utopia * The Christmas Music of Black America + 2

Is Christmas Special as a Mythology? * Gaia * Utopia * The Christmas Music of Black America + 2

Is Christmas special?

Only to Christians? Only if you believe that a child was born, died as a man in sacrifice to human folly, then resurrected?

It's a critical yes/no question for those who believe in and support the notion that all mythologies regardless of ethnic, religious, political upbringing are meaningful in the best of ways. Don't all mythologies hold merit when expressed in a positive manner with a message of rebirth and salvation?

Regarding the commercialization of Christmas, especially for children, the spirit of giving need not be concentrated on selfish expectations. After all, there's the gift of health and happiness that all can hopefully enjoy regardless the price of toys. Is that not the gift that all parents pray for in their own way?

What about the Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny, Gaia's bounty? Are these not precious mythological gems from the past that we need to preserve so as to motive our progeny to thrive in wonderment and expectation of all that is good and wholesome? A glimpse of Utopia? Heaven on Earth?

And if there is ever to be a genuine expression of Utopia, will Santa, the Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny, Gaia and the full pantheon of human mythology be there in celebration?

Discuss. It's a yes/no question...



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In Greek mythology, Gaia (/ˈɡeɪ.ə/ or /ˈɡaɪ.ə/; from Ancient Greek Γαῖα, a poetical form of Γῆ Gē, "land" or "earth"),[1] also spelled Gaea (/ˈdʒiːə/), is the personification of the Earth[2] and one of the Greek primordial deities. Gaia is the ancestral mother of all life: the primal Mother Earth goddess. She is the immediate parent of Uranus (the sky), from whose sexual union she bore the Titans (themselves parents of many of the Olympian gods) and the Giants, and of Pontus (the sea), from whose union she bore the primordial sea gods. Her equivalent in the Roman pantheon was Terra.[3]

See Wikipedia and other sites for full details...



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A utopia (/juːˈtoʊpiə/ yoo-TOH-pee-ə) is an imagined community or society that possesses highly desirable or nearly perfect qualities for its citizens.[1] The opposite of a utopia is a dystopia. One could also say that utopia is a perfect "place" that has been designed so there are no problems.

Utopia focuses on equality in economics, government and justice, though by no means exclusively, with the method and structure of proposed implementation varying based on ideology.[2] According to Lyman Tower Sargent "there are socialist, capitalist, monarchical, democratic, anarchist, ecological, feminist, patriarchal, egalitarian, hierarchical, racist, left-wing, right-wing, reformist, Naturists/Nude Christians, free love, nuclear family, extended family, gay, lesbian, and many more utopias [...] Utopianism, some argue, is essential for the improvement of the human condition. But if used wrongly, it becomes dangerous. Utopia has an inherent contradictory nature here."[3] Sargent argues that utopia's nature is inherently contradictory, because societies are not homogenous, and have desires which conflict and therefore cannot simultaneously be satisfied. If any two desires cannot be simultaneously satisfied, true utopia cannot be attained because in utopia all desires are satisfied.

The term utopia was coined from Greek by Sir Thomas More for his 1516 book Utopia, describing a fictional island society in the south Atlantic Ocean off the coast of South America.

The word comes from Greek: οὐ ("not") and τόπος ("place") and means "no-place", and strictly describes any non-existent society 'described in considerable detail'. However, in standard usage, the word's meaning has narrowed and now usually describes a non-existent society that is intended to be viewed as considerably better than contemporary society.[4] Eutopia, derived from Greek εὖ ("good" or "well") and τόπος ("place"), means "good place", and is strictly speaking the correct term to describe a positive utopia. In English, eutopia and utopia are homophonous, which may have given rise to the change in meaning.[4][5]

See Wikipedia site for further details...


Initial music selection is courtesy of Robert Harris, Musicologist and Broadcaster, who collaborated with Michael Enright, host of the CBC Radio program The Sunday Edition which airs every Sunday morning from 9 AM to Noon, EST.


Courtesy of the CBC Radio web site
CBC Radio · December 20, 2015

Please visit the CBC Radio site in order to hear the full program presentation including all music selections therein.

The Christmas Music of Black America

All through December, we are awash in a sea of Christmas music -- much of it sentimental, over-wrought and just plain awful. Robert Harris makes the case that black America is one community that has always loved Christmas and respected its music. Artists like Ella Fitzgerald, Bessie Smith, Count Basie, Whitney Houston, Quincy Jones and Billie Holiday grew up singing and playing music in church. Robert has chosen some fine examples of gospel, blues and jazz; Christmas music that is original, tasteful and heartfelt.

For more from Robert - including his much-praised series, "Twenty Pieces of Music that Changed the World", go here -

All music selections here below courtesy of YouTube, related artists and their representatives.


Mel Torme - Christmas Time is Here

Mel Tormé - Topic
Published on Oct 19, 2016

Provided to YouTube by Universal Music Group North America

Christmastime Is Here (From "A Charlie Brown Christmas") · Mel Tormé

Christmas Songs

℗ 1992 Telarc International Corp.
℗ ℗ 1992 Telarc International Corp.

Released on: 1992-10-28

Producer: Robert Woods
Author, Composer: Lee Mendelson
Author, Composer: Vince Guaraldi
Music Publisher: Lee Mendelson Film Productions Inc. (BMI)

Auto-generated by YouTube.

Category: Music

BB King - Merry Christmas Baby

Published on Jul 25, 2017

Provided to YouTube by Universal Music Group North America

Merry Christmas Baby · B.B. King

Contemporary Jazz Christmas

℗ 1993 Geffen Records

Released on: 1997-01-01

Alto Saxophone, Recording Arranger: Walter King
Tenor Saxophone: Melvin Jackson
Trumpet: James Bolden
Guitar: Leon Warren
Bass Guitar: Michael Doster
Piano: James Toney
Drums: Calep Emphrey
Tambourine: Tony Coleman
Mix Engineer, Recording Engineer: Josiah Gluck
Asst. Recording Engineer: Devin Emke
Assistant Mixer: Ken Quartarone
Assistant Mixer: Rich Costey
Producer: Michael Abene
Associate Producer: Gretchen Hoffmann Abene
Author, Composer: Johnny Moore
Author, Composer: Lou Baxter
Music Publisher: Chappell & Co.

Auto-generated by YouTube.

Category: Music

Fairfield Four - Last Month Of The Year

Published on Nov 9, 2014

The Fairfield Four was disbanded in 1950, but they reunited 30 years later. "Last Month of the Year" is from their 1992 release, "Standing In The Safety Zone" which is filled with wonderful music. Enjoy!

The Fairfield Four - Arrangement Collaboration, Primary Artist
Stuart Duncan - Baritone (Vocal)
Pat Enright - Tenor (Vocal)
Isaac Freeman - Bass, Bass (Vocal), Director, Musical Director,
James Hill - Baritone (Vocal), Management
Gene Libbea - Baritone (Vocal)
Sam McCrary - Tenor (Vocal)
The Nashville Bluegrass Band - Guest Artist
Alan O'Bryant - Vocals
Rev. W.L. Richardson - Vocals
Walter Settles - Vocals
Edward Thomas - Tenor (Vocal)
Wilson Waters - Tenor (Vocal)
Roland White - Bass (Vocal)

Category: Music

Song: Last Month of the Year
Artist: The Fairfield Four
Album: Standing In the Safety Zone
Licensed to YouTube by: Curb Records (on behalf of Word Records); Warner Chappell, and 2 Music Rights Societies

Fats Waller - Swingin' Them Jingle Bells

Published on Dec 25, 2010

Category: Music
Song: Swingin' Them Jingle Bells
Artist: Fats Waller
Album: Vintage Christmas Tree
Licensed to YouTube by: SME (on behalf of Past Perfect); PEDL, ASCAP, UBEM, Kobalt Music Publishing, and 1 Music Rights Societies

Count Basie - Good Morning Blues

Classic Mood Experience
Published on Dec 19, 2012

Classic Mood Experience The best masterpieces ever recorded in the music history.

William James "Count" Basie (August 21, 1904 – April 26, 1984) was an American jazz pianist, organist, bandleader, and composer. His mother taught him to play the piano and he started performing in his teens. Dropping out of school, he learned to operate lights for vaudeville and to improvise accompaniment for silent films at a local movie theater in his home town of Red Bank, New Jersey. By 16 years old, he increasingly played jazz piano at parties, resorts and other venues. In 1924, he went to Harlem, where his performing career expanded; he toured with groups to the major jazz cities of Chicago, St. Louis and Kansas City. In 1929 he joined Bennie Moten's band in Kansas City, and played with them until Moten's death in 1935.

In 1935, Basie formed his own jazz orchestra, the Count Basie Orchestra, and in 1936 took them to Chicago for a long engagement and their first recording. He led the group for almost 50 years, creating innovations like the use of two "split" tenor saxophones, emphasizing the rhythm section, riffing with a big band, using arrangers to broaden their sound, and others. Many musicians came to prominence under his direction, including the tenor saxophonists Lester Young and Herschel Evans, the guitarist Freddie Green, trumpeters Buck Clayton and Harry "Sweets" Edison and singers Jimmy Rushing and Joe Williams. Basie's theme songs were "One O'Clock Jump", developed in 1935 in the early days of his band, and later "April in Paris".

Category: Music

Song: Good Morning Blues
Artist: James Rushing
Album: Kansas City Jazz
Licensed to YouTube by: (on behalf of Hallmark); PEDL, ASCAP, Warner Chappell, UBEM, and 3 Music Rights Societies

Whitney Houston - Do you hear what I hear

Christmas Music Videos
Published on Oct 16, 2016

Category: People & Blogs


Lest we forget artists such as Nat King Cole, Sidney Poitier, Mahalia Jackson...


Nat King Cole - Chestnuts Roasting On An Open Fire

Published on Jul 18, 2011

Category: Music
Song: The Christmas Song
Artist: Nat King Cole
Album: Merry Christmas - The Rocking X-Mas Edition
Writers: Mel Tormé, Robert Wells
Licensed to YouTube by: INgrooves (on behalf of Zebralution); Kobalt Music Publishing, PEDL, EMI Music Publishing, Warner Chappell, AdShare (Publishing), Sony ATV Publishing, and 1 Music Rights Societies

Lilies of the Field - Amen

Published on Jul 17, 2007

This is the final scene in the film directed by Ralph Nelson. It's the scene where Homer Smith, played by Sidney Poitier leaves Mother Maria, played by Lilia Skala after building them a chapel. After taking one last look at the chapel he built, Smith, knowing that his work is done, slips into his car and drives quietly off into the night.

Category: Film & Animation

Silent Night- Mahalia Jackson

KJ McRae
Published on Aug 13, 2016

Silent Night, Mahalia Jackson.

Category: Music

Louis Armstrong & Mahalia Jackson - Just A Closer Walk With Thee - 7/10/1970 (Official)

Louis Armstrong on MV

Published on Feb 6, 2015
Louis Armstrong & Mahalia Jackson - Just A Closer Walk With Thee

Recorded Live: 7/10/1970 - Newport Jazz Festival - Newport, RI

Category: Music


A Canadian in London...

Leonard Cohen - Hallelujah (Live In London)

Published on Oct 2, 2009

Category: Music
Song: Hallelujah
Artist: Leonard Cohen
Album: Live In London (Alben für die Ewigkeit)
Writer: Leonard Cohen

Licensed to YouTube by: SME (on behalf of Columbia); ARESA, UBEM, Sony ATV Publishing, CMRRA, SOLAR Music Rights Management, and 16 Music Rights Societies


Finally, in celebration of the Season as personified by a young child...

The Little Drummer Boy (Perfect Version)

Published on Nov 1, 2009

All Rights Belong to Artists Involved.

"The Little Drummer Boy" is a popular Christmas song, with words and music by Katherine K. Davis. Henry Onorati and Harry Simeone have been credited with writing the song, even though they were only the arrangers for their recordings of it.

The lyrics tell the apocryphal story of a poor young boy who, unable to afford a gift for the infant Jesus, plays his drum for the newborn with the Virgin Mary's approval. Miraculously, the baby, although a newborn, seems to understand and smiles at the boy in gratitude. The story is somewhat similar to an old twelfth-century legend retold by Anatole France as Le jongleur de Notre-Dame (The Juggler of Notre Dame), which was adapted into an opera in 1902 by Jules Massenet. In the French legend, however, a juggler juggles before the statue of the Virgin Mary, and the statue, according to which version of the legend one reads, either smiles at him or throws him a rose (or both, as in the 1984 made-for-television film).

Performers: The Harry Simeone Chorale

Period: 20th Century

Written: 1941; USA

Category: Music


Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! Enjoy the holidays!

Health, happiness and well being to you and yours.

May our world embrace Utopian values so that our children inherit a quality of live worth living!


DISCLAIMER: UFF does not own any of the above works, nor do we claim responsibility or ownership for any images or audio tracks shown in these and other videos UFF has posted. All rights go to their respective owners.


UFF Commentary Notes are the sole responsibility of the President of UFF.

See post of November 29, 2017 for full transparency details.


Ergonomics 101 (Comfort or Efficiency?) Definitions * UFF Commentary * Neoliberalism * History of Money * Life Over Money?! Greed (Social Experiment) * When Money Isn’t Real * Money Quotes, Humour & Music * Kids Decide Between Helping the Homeless or Ice Cream

Ergonomics 101 (Comfort or Efficiency?) Definitions * UFF Commentary * Neoliberalism * History of Money * Life Over Money?! Greed (Social Experiment) * When Money Isn’t Real * Money Quotes, Humour & Music * Kids Decide Between Helping the Homeless or Ice Cream


What do most people know about ergonomics other than comfortable chairs that are good for your posture and ergonomic keyboards that help minimize wrist stress?

Surprisingly, here's a basic definition from an internet search -


er·go·nom·ics [ˌərɡəˈnämiks]


the study of people's efficiency in their working environment.


Is that what ergonomic chairs in the office are all about? Improving work efficiencies?

Economic Ergonomics?

What about the human element (comfort)?

Humane Ergonomics?

Consider the below Wikipedia entry.


Human Factors and Ergonomics:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Human factors and ergonomics (commonly referred to as human factors) is the application of psychological and physiological principles to the (engineering and) design of products, processes, and systems. The goal of human factors is to reduce human error, increase productivity, and enhance safety and comfort with a specific focus on the interaction between the human and the thing of interest.[1]

The field is a combination of numerous disciplines, such as psychology, sociology, engineering, biomechanics, industrial design, physiology, anthropometry, interaction design, visual design, user experience, and user interface design. In research, human factors employs the scientific method to study human behavior so that the resultant data may be applied to the four primary goals. In essence, it is the study of designing equipment, devices and processes that fit the human body and its cognitive abilities. The two terms "human factors" and "ergonomics" are essentially synonymous.[2][3][4]

The International Ergonomics Association defines ergonomics or human factors as follows:[5]

Ergonomics (or human factors) is the scientific discipline concerned with the understanding of interactions among humans and other elements of a system, and the profession that applies theory, principles, data and methods to design to optimize human well-being and overall system performance.

See Wikipedia site for detailed information on ergonomics, specifically: Etymology, Domains of Specialization, Physical, Cognitive and Organizational Ergonomics, History of the Field, Methods, Footnotes, References and more...


UFF Commentary continued:

Ergonomic Performance in the workplace are metrics that help determine efficiencies, productivity, ultimately profitability.

How strange it is that Monetary Ergonomics has yet to be explored as a topic of research and/or discussion at a corporate (including non profit and charity) and/or academic level.

"Monetary Ergonomics". What does it mean? How can we define?

Example: Monetary Ergonomics is the application of monetary resources in the interest of humane system performance in service to ecological integrity.

Make sense? Compared to what?

Capitalism and its prime motivator, monetary profit (the profit imperative), according to protagonists, optimizes human well being and overall systems performance.

Are capitalists taking on climate change, or is denial the order of the day? After all, planet Earth has experienced climate cycles in the past. Is humanity the prime reason for recent observations? What about volcanoes spewing ash and lava, earthquakes shattering the very foundation of the planet, the Sun burning, projecting energy until when?...

It's only a matter of time before we all burn along with the planet although that'll take a billion years or so to determine.

Meanwhile, climate chaos encroaches. How much are we as humans contributing to climate change and what will our contribution be regarding best results overall now that we know what we know, assuming we are that critical to life as we know it.

What about pollution, crime, inequality, poverty?

Is capitalism contributing to humane global solutions or taking advantage of existing social/political/economic systems and purposefully bringing us closer to Dystopia in a bold expression of survival of the monetary?

No need to answer that question.

If discussion is of advantage, proceed...


Let's continue with specific realities that shed light on how capitalism and the monetary profit imperative have influenced our "market value" as human beings:

Who's more important to the future of humanity?

One who cares for elders in a meaningful way such as a PSW (Personal Support Worker), or

One who can run fast, throw a ball real good, win games, make substantial contributions to our community both as a role model for success and as a philanthropist*.

* tax exemptions included (as in write offs so as to reduce personal income tax).

One can say both individuals are valuable in their own way. No disrespect for professional athletes taking advantage of market economics, however -

PSW's may get close to minimum wage for tending to frail, at times incontinent elders in a timely, dignified, compassionate manner. Sorry about the poverty wages, PSW's. Sure hope you don't take it out on some of our most vulnerable citizens! Yet the sad truth is s**t happens in understaffed retirement communities that are based on the profit imperative.

Meanwhile, earlier this year, a quarterback for an NFL team negotiated through his agent a four year contract extension worth over 130 million dollars. Nice pass! Go Team! And this is just one example of how generous we can be to those who excel at sports, never mind other lucrative careers wherein the lottery of life pays out big time in wealth well beyond the needs of any individual.

What would be fair in a world of monetary ergonomic integrity?

Consider the following results of a recent survey that asked Canadians how much money (salary) it would take to meet their needs for a comfortable lifestyle.

Courtesy of:
11/03/2018 18:45 EDT | Updated 11/04/2018 13:34 EST

Canadians Believe The Average Salary They Need For 'Comfort' Is $250,000
TFW your ideal salary is five times the national median income.

By Liz Haq

Would a quarter of $1 million a year solve all of your financial woes?

Almost 1,500 Canadians were asked how much individual pre-tax income would make them feel "financially comfortable" in a survey by financial services firm Edward Jones. The verdict came in at a cool $250,000.

But why stop there? Being comfortable is great, but it's certainly not going to buy you that fancy watch you've been eyeing or get you to Rome anytime soon. When asked how much they'd need to achieve the lifestyle they "truly desire," most participants added another $50,000 to that total.

While both figures would be a far cry from Canada's median after-tax income of $56,000, the survey found that people always felt they earned less than they desired, regardless of which end of the earning scale they were on.

"The more people earn, the more they believe they need," Patrick French, principal of solutions tools and consulting with Edward Jones, told HuffPost Canada on Wednesday. "That's because as salary increases, so does expenditure."

The data was broken down by region: Albertans had the grandest financial aspirations, requiring almost $350,000 to feel comfortable. The phenomenon could be attributed to prolonged economic hardship and mounting debt in the province, French surmised. Manitoba and Saskatchewan needed the least, at about $157,000.

Older Canadians require the most

Figures also differed across generations: Canadians aged 55 to 64 had the most extravagant desired salary at a whopping $398,347. The report said that "this age group may be saddled with unwanted financial responsibilities."
French said those lofty ambitions can be partially attributed to failing to properly plan for retirement. Another financial burden could include helping children and grandchildren pay for homes in expensive real estate markets across the country.


To what extent can the current monetary system deliver adequate income across the board based on North American and/or European standards?



Let's scope ergonomics out further:

What about war and military expenditures overall, globally.

That's trillions of dollars spent on defence, destruction and pain, suffering, death. Paid for with our tax dollars. All in the interest of freedom, democracy?

Or is it possibly political fascism hiding behind neoliberalism?

Consider the following...

NOTE: UFF Commentary continues after the below Wikipedia entry on Neoliberalism.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neoliberalism or neo-liberalism[1] refers primarily to the 20th-century resurgence of 19th-century ideas associated with laissez-faire economic liberalism.[2]:7 Those ideas include economic liberalization policies such as privatization, austerity, deregulation, free trade[3] and reductions in government spending in order to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society.[11] These market-based ideas and the policies they inspired constitute a paradigm shift away from the post-war Keynesian consensus which lasted from 1945 to 1980.[12][13]

English-speakers have used the term "neoliberalism" since the start of the 20th century with different meanings,[14] but it became more prevalent in its current meaning in the 1970s and 1980s, used by scholars in a wide variety of social sciences[15][16] as well as by critics.[17][18] Modern advocates of free market policies avoid the term "neoliberal"[19] and some scholars have described the term as meaning different things to different people[20][21] as neoliberalism "mutated" into geopolitically distinct hybrids as it travelled around the world.[4] As such, neoliberalism shares many attributes with other concepts that have contested meanings, including democracy.[22]

The definition and usage of the term have changed over time.[5] As an economic philosophy, neoliberalism emerged among European liberal scholars in the 1930s as they attempted to trace a so-called "third" or "middle" way between the conflicting philosophies of classical liberalism and socialist planning.[23]:14–15 The impetus for this development arose from a desire to avoid repeating the economic failures of the early 1930s, which neoliberals mostly blamed on the economic policy of classical liberalism. In the decades that followed, the use of the term "neoliberal" tended to refer to theories which diverged from the more laissez-faire doctrine of classical liberalism and which promoted instead a market economy under the guidance and rules of a strong state, a model which came to be known as the social market economy.

In the 1960s, usage of the term "neoliberal" heavily declined. When the term re-appeared in the 1980s in connection with Augusto Pinochet's economic reforms in Chile, the usage of the term had shifted. It had not only become a term with negative connotations employed principally by critics of market reform, but it also had shifted in meaning from a moderate form of liberalism to a more radical and laissez-faire capitalist set of ideas. Scholars now tended to associate it with the theories of Mont Pelerin Society economists Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman and James M. Buchanan, along with politicians and policy-makers such as Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and Alan Greenspan.[5][24] Once the new meaning of neoliberalism became established as a common usage among Spanish-speaking scholars, it diffused into the English-language study of political economy.[5] By 1994, with the passage of NAFTA and with the Zapatistas' reaction to this development in Chiapas, the term entered global circulation.[4] Scholarship on the phenomenon of neoliberalism has been growing over the last couple of decades.[16] The impact of the global 2008–2009 crisis has also given rise to new scholarship that criticizes neoliberalism and seeks policy alternatives.[25]

Please see Wikipedia site for extensive details on Neoliberalism Origins, Early History, Traditions, etc.


Now, consider the following notes from a CBC Ideas radio presentation:

Is Neoliberalism Destroying The World?

CBC Radio · September 26, 2018

Deregulation. Infinite growth. Self-correcting markets. All are hallmarks of neoliberal thinking. But they're more than just assumptions about the economy. They undergird much of the most influential thinking about governance right now, and dominate political and economic thinking everywhere. The results, according to some, have been disastrous. Investigative journalist Bruce Livesey asks four experts about the rise and rule of neoliberal thought, and what it may mean for societies around the world.

"The Trump administration is largely populated by people from the neoliberal thought collective and they are busily carrying out things that they wanted to do for years."
- Philip Mirowski

The term "neoliberalism" is likely more used than understood. But if at its heart it's the ideology that markets know better than humans, then its ascension into virtually every sector of society is nearly complete. At least that's the view of economic historian, Philip Mirowski at the University of Notre Dame. For him, the presidency of Donald Trump represents textbook neoliberalism: privatizing education and health care, gutting the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as well as health and safety, and food safety laws.

"People don't pay any attention to this because they're so fascinated by the buffoonery of Trump himself," Mirowsky says. "The Trump administration is largely populated by people from the neoliberal thought collective and they are busily carrying out things that they wanted to do for years."

Trump's government is simply the visible part of the ideological iceberg that is neoliberalism. Brexit, the rise of extreme right-wing nationalism and anti-globalization, the Euro crisis, austerity, consumer debt and economic anxiety — these are all arguably byproducts of neoliberalism's ideology.

From Ideas -
You hear the term everywhere. But what exactly is neoliberalism?

Listen to Philip Mirowski, Anat R. Admati, Sam Gindin, Yanis Varoufakis and Bruce Livesey on neoliberalism by visiting the CBC Radio site and accessing the Ideas program in full.


How comfortable or discomforted should we be with the concept and realities of neoliberalism?



UFF Commentary continues...

Most underpaid people labour longer hours than recommended by health specialists so as to support families, pay the bills, just to get by. Is that ergonomically sound in the long run? Market economics deliver the lottery of life to the few. Monetary ergonomics for the few, the gifted.

Is that really fair and just, all things considered?


WHAT IF we educate children on the importance of ergonomics in terms of:

Income (Monetary Ergonomics)

Emotions (Emotional Economics)

Community (Social Economics)

Religion (Spiritual Economics)

And WHAT IF we challenge youth through education methodologies to explore BEST ERGONOMIC PRACTICES in the interest of the well being of humanity in general?

Then, WHAT IF we devote our energies and economics to make children's dreams come true?

Pie in the sky? Pipe dream? Utopian ergonomic fantasy?

What price will our children pay for the ongoing folly of the profit imperative?

Consider the following before attempting to answer the above questions:


History of Money
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The history of money concerns the development of means of carrying out transactions involving a medium of exchange. Money is any clearly identifiable object of value that is generally accepted as payment for goods and services and repayment of debts within a market, or which is legal tender within a country. While money is always a medium of exchange, not all mediums of exchange are money in the numismatic sense.

Significant evidence establishes many things were bartered in ancient markets that could be described as a medium of exchange. These included livestock and grain – things directly useful in themselves – but also merely attractive items such as cowrie shells or beads were exchanged for more useful commodities. However, such exchanges would be better described as barter, and the common bartering of a particular commodity (especially when the commodity items are not fungible) does not technically make that commodity "money" or a "commodity money" like the shekel – which was both a coin representing a specific weight of barley, and the weight of that sack of barley.[1]

Due to the complexities of ancient history (ancient civilizations developing at different paces and not keeping accurate records or having their records destroyed), and because the ancient origins of economic systems precede written history, it is impossible to trace the true origin of the invention of money and the transition from " barter systems" to the " monetary systems". Further, evidence in the histories[2] supports the idea that money has taken two main forms divided into the broad categories of money of account (debits and credits on ledgers) and money of exchange (tangible media of exchange made from wood, paper, bamboo, metal, etc.), and it is debated which was created first.

Regarding money of account, the tally stick can reasonably be described as a very primitive ledger – the oldest of which dates to the Aurignacian, about 30,000 years ago. While it may not be reasonable to conclude the most ancient tally sticks were used to keep accounting records in the monetary system sense of the term, their existence does show that "accounting" – keeping a written record of things counted – is far more ancient than many people assume. David Graeber proposes that money as a unit of account was invented when the unquantifiable obligation "I owe you one" transformed into the quantifiable notion of "I owe you one unit of something". In this view, money emerged first as credit and only later took the form of a medium of exchange.[3][4]

Regarding money of exchange, the use of representative money historically pre-dates the invention of coinage. In the ancient empires of Egypt, Babylon, India and China, the temples and palaces often had commodity warehouses which issued certificates of deposit as evidence of a claim upon a portion of the goods stored in the warehouses.[5] Because these "claim tickets" could be redeemed at the warehouse for the commodity they represented, they were able to be bartered in the markets as if they were the commodity.

While not the oldest form of money of exchange, various metals (both common and precious metals) were also used in both barter systems and monetary systems and the historical use of metals provides some of the clearest illustration of how the barter systems gave birth to monetary systems. The Romans' use of bronze, while not among the more ancient examples is well documented, and it illustrates this transition clearly. First, the "aes rude" (rough bronze) was used. This was a heavy weight of unmeasured bronze used in what was properly a barter system -- the barter-ability of the bronze was related exclusively to its usefulness in blacksmithing and it was bartered with the intent of being turned into tools. The next historical step was bronze in bars that had a 5-pound pre-measured weight (presumably to make barter easier and more fair), called "aes signatum" (signed bronze), which is where debate arises between if this is still the barter system or now a monetary system. Finally, there is a clear break from the use of bronze in barter into its undebatable use as money because of lighter measures of bronze not intended to be used as anything other than coinage for transactions. The aes grave (heavy bronze) (or As) is the start of the use of coins in Rome, but not the oldest known example metal coinage.

Prehistory: Predecessors of Money and its Emergence[edit]

Non-monetary exchange[edit]


In Politics Book 1:9[6] (c. 350 BCE) the Greek philosopher Aristotle contemplated the nature of money. He considered that every object has two uses: the original purpose for which the object was designed, and as an item to sell or barter.[7] The assignment of monetary value to an otherwise insignificant object such as a coin or promissory note arises as people acquired a psychological capacity to place trust in each other and in external authority within barter exchange.[8][9]

With barter, an individual possessing any surplus of value, such as a measure of grain or a quantity of livestock, could directly exchange it for something perceived to have similar or greater value or utility, such as a clay pot or a tool. The capacity to carry out barter transactions is limited in that it depends on a coincidence of wants. The seller of food grain has to find the buyer who wants to buy grain and who also could offer in return something the seller wants to buy. There is no agreed standard measure into which both seller and buyer could exchange commodities according to their relative value of all the various goods and services offered by other potential barter partners.

There is no evidence, historic or contemporary, of a society in which barter is the main mode of exchange.[10]


In his book Debt: The First 5,000 Years, anthropologist David Graeber argues against the suggestion that money was invented to replace barter. The problem with this version of history, he suggests, is the lack of any supporting evidence. His research indicates that "gift economies" were common, at least at the beginnings of the first agrarian societies, when humans used elaborate credit systems. Graeber proposes that money as a unit of account was invented the moment when the unquantifiable obligation "I owe you one" transformed into the quantifiable notion of "I owe you one unit of something". In this view, money emerged first as credit and only later acquired the functions of a medium of exchange and a store of value.[3][4]. Graeber's criticism partly relies on and follows that made by Michell A. Innes in his 1913 pamphlet "What is money?". Innes refutes the barter theory of money, by examining historic evidence and showing that early coins never were of consistent value nor of more or less consistent metal content. Therefore he concludes that sales is not exchange of goods for some universal commodity, but an exchange for credit. He argues that "credit and credit alone is money"[11]. Anthropologist Caroline Humphrey examines the available ethnographic data and concludes that "No example of a barter economy, pure and simple, has ever been described, let alone the emergence from it of money; all available ethnography suggests that there never has been such a thing"[12].

Gift economy[edit]

In a gift economy, valuable goods and services are regularly given without any explicit agreement for immediate or future rewards (i.e. there is no formal quid pro quo).[13] Ideally, simultaneous or recurring giving serves to circulate and redistribute valuables within the community.

There are various social theories concerning gift economies. Some consider the gifts to be a form of reciprocal altruism. Another interpretation is that implicit "I owe you" debt[14] and social status are awarded in return for the "gifts".[15] Consider for example, the sharing of food in some hunter-gatherer societies, where food-sharing is a safeguard against the failure of any individual's daily foraging. This custom may reflect altruism, it may be a form of informal insurance, or may bring with it social status or other benefits.

Emergence of Money[edit]

After the domestication of cattle and the start of cultivation of crops in 9000–6000 BCE, livestock and plant products were used as money.[16]

In the earliest instances of trade with money, the things with the greatest utility and reliability in terms of re-use and re-trading (their marketability), determined the nature of the objects chosen to exchange. So as in agricultural societies, things needed for efficient and comfortable employment of energies for the production of cereals and the like were the easiest to transfer to monetary significance for direct exchange. As more of the basic conditions of human existence were met,[17] so the division of labour increased to create new activities for the use of time[clarification needed] to address more advanced concerns. As people's needs became more refined, indirect exchange became more likely, as the physical separation of skilled labourers (suppliers) from their prospective clients (demand) required the use of a medium common to all communities, to facilitate a wider market.[18][19]

Aristotle's opinion of the creation of money as a new thing in society is:[9]

When the inhabitants of one country became more dependent on those of another, and they imported what they needed, and exported what they had too much of, money necessarily came into use.[20]

Bronze Age: Commodity Money, Credit and Debt[edit]

Many cultures around the world developed the use of commodity money, that is, objects that have value in themselves as well as value in their use as money.[21] Ancient China, Africa, and India used cowry shells.
The Mesopotamian civilization developed a large-scale economy based on commodity money. The shekel was the unit of weight and currency, first recorded c. 3000 BCE, referring to a specific weight of barley, and equivalent amounts of silver, bronze, copper etc.[1] The Babylonians and their neighboring city states later developed the earliest system of economics as we think of it today, in terms of rules on debt,[14] legal contracts and law codes relating to business practices and private property. Money was not only an emergence[clarification needed], it was a necessity.[22][23]

The Code of Hammurabi, the best-preserved ancient law code, was created c. 1760 BCE (middle chronology) in ancient Babylon. It was enacted by the sixth Babylonian king, Hammurabi. Earlier collections of laws include the code of Ur-Nammu, king of Ur (c. 2050 BCE), the Code of Eshnunna (c. 1930 BCE) and the code of Lipit-Ishtar of Isin (c. 1870 BCE).[2] These law codes formalized the role of money in civil society. They set amounts of interest on debt, fines for "wrongdoing", and compensation in money for various infractions of formalized law.

It has long been assumed that metals, where available, were favored for use as proto-money over such commodities as cattle, cowry shells, or salt, because metals are at once durable, portable, and easily divisible.[24] The use of gold as proto-money has been traced back to the fourth millennium BCE when the Egyptians used gold bars of a set weight as a medium of exchange,[citation needed] as had been done earlier in Mesopotamia with silver bars.[citation needed]

The first mention in the Bible of the use of money is in the Book of Genesis[25] in reference to criteria for the circumcision of a bought slave. Later, the Cave of Machpelah is purchased (with silver[26][27]) by Abraham, some time after 1985 BCE.[28][29][30][31] The currency was also in use amongst the Philistine people of the same period.[32]

1000 BCE – 400 CE[edit]
Standardized coinage[edit]

From about 1000 BCE, money in the form of small knives and spades made of bronze was in use in China during the Zhou dynasty, with cast bronze replicas of cowrie shells in use before this. The first manufactured coins seem to have appeared separately in India, China, and the cities around the Aegean Sea between 700 and 500 BCE.[33] While these Aegean coins were stamped (heated and hammered with insignia), the Indian coins (from the Ganges river valley) were punched metal disks, and Chinese coins (first developed in the Great Plain) were cast bronze with holes in the center to be strung together. The different forms and metallurgical processes imply a separate development.[34]

The first ruler in the Mediterranean known to have officially set standards of weight and money was Pheidon.[35] Minting occurred in the late 7th century BCE amongst the Greek cities of Asia Minor, spreading to the Greek islands of the Aegean and to the south of Italy by 500 BCE.[36] The first stamped money (having the mark of some authority in the form of a picture or words) can be seen in the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris. It is an electrum stater of a turtle coin, coined at Aegina island. This coin[37] dates to about 700 BCE.[38]

Other coins made of electrum (a naturally occurring alloy of silver and gold) were manufactured on a larger scale about 650 BCE in Lydia (on the coast of what is now Turkey).[39] Similar coinage was adopted and manufactured to their own standards in nearby cities of Ionia, including Mytilene and Phokaia (using coins of electrum) and Aegina (using silver) during the 6th century BCE, and soon became adopted in mainland Greece, and the Persian Empire (after it incorporated Lydia in 547 BCE).

The use and export of silver coinage, along with soldiers paid in coins, contributed to the Athenian Empire's dominance of the region in the 5th century BCE. The silver used was mined in southern Attica at Laurium and Thorikos by a huge workforce of slave labour. A major silver vein discovery at Laurium in 483 BCE led to the huge expansion of the Athenian military fleet.

The worship of Moneta is recorded by Livy with the temple built in the time of Rome 413 (123)[clarification needed]; a temple consecrated to the same goddess was built in the earlier part of the 4th century (perhaps the same temple).[40][41][42] For four centuries the temple contained the mint of Rome.[43][36] The name of the goddess thus became the source of numerous words in English and the Romance languages, including the words "money" and "mint".


The discovery of the touchstone led the way to metal-based commodity money and coinage. Any soft metal can be tested for purity on a touchstone. Gold is a soft metal, which is also hard to come by, dense, and storable. As a result, monetary gold spread very quickly from Asia Minor, where it first gained wide usage, to the entire world.[dubious – discuss]

Using such a system still required several steps and mathematical calculation.[dubious – discuss] The touchstone allows one to estimate the amount of gold in an alloy, which is then multiplied by the weight to find the amount of gold alone in a lump. To make this process easier, the concept of standard coinage was introduced. Coins were pre-weighed and pre-alloyed, so as long as the user knew the origin of the coin, the touchstone was not required. Coins were typically minted by governments in a carefully protected process, and then stamped with an emblem that guaranteed the weight and value of the metal. It was, however, extremely common for governments to assert that the value of such money lay in its emblem and thus to subsequently to reduce the value of the currency by lowering the content of valuable metal.

General Notes[edit]
[This is not pre 400 AD]

Gold and silver have been the most common forms of money throughout history. In many languages, such as Spanish, French, and Italian, the word for silver is still directly related to the word for money. Sometimes other metals were used. For instance, Ancient Sparta minted coins from iron to discourage its citizens from engaging in foreign trade.[44] In the early 17th century Sweden lacked precious metals, and so produced "plate money": large slabs of copper 50 cm or more in length and width, stamped with indications of their value.

Gold coins began to be minted again in Europe in the 13th century. Frederick II is credited with having reintroduced gold coins during the Crusades. During the 14th century Europe changed from use of silver in currency to minting of gold.[45][46] Vienna made this change in 1328.[45]

Metal-based coins had the advantage of carrying their value within the coins themselves – on the other hand, they induced manipulations, such as the clipping of coins to remove some of the precious metal. A greater problem was the simultaneous co-existence of gold, silver and copper coins in Europe. The exchange rates between the metals varied with supply and demand. For instance the gold guinea coin began to rise against the silver crown in England in the 1670s and 1680s. Consequently, silver was exported from England in exchange for gold imports. The effect was worsened with Asian traders not sharing the European appreciation of gold altogether — gold left Asia and silver left Europe in quantities European observers like Isaac Newton, Master of the Royal Mint observed with unease.[47]

Stability came when national banks guaranteed to change silver money into gold at a fixed rate; it did, however, not come easily. The Bank of England risked a national financial catastrophe in the 1730s when customers demanded their money be changed into gold in a moment of crisis. Eventually London's merchants saved the bank and the nation with financial guarantees.[citation needed]

Another step in the evolution of money was the change from a coin being a unit of weight to being a unit of value. A distinction could be made between its commodity value and its specie value. The difference in these values is seigniorage.[48][citation needed]


Paper money was introduced in Song Dynasty China during the 11th century.[49] The development of the banknote began in the seventh century, with local issues of paper currency. Its roots were in merchant receipts of deposit during the Tang Dynasty (618–907), as merchants and wholesalers desired to avoid the heavy bulk of copper coinage in large commercial transactions.[50][51][52] The issue of credit notes is often for a limited duration, and at some discount to the promised amount later. The jiaozi nevertheless did not replace coins during the Song Dynasty; paper money was used alongside the coins. The central government soon observed the economic advantages of printing paper money, issuing a monopoly right of several of the deposit shops to the issuance of these certificates of deposit.[53] By the early 12th century, the amount of banknotes issued in a single year amounted to an annual rate of 26 million strings of cash coins.[54]

In the 13th century, paper money became known in Europe through the accounts of travelers, such as Marco Polo and William of Rubruck.[55] Marco Polo's account of paper money during the Yuan Dynasty is the subject of a chapter of his book, The Travels of Marco Polo, titled "How the Great Kaan Causeth the Bark of Trees, Made into Something Like Paper, to Pass for Money All Over his Country."[56] In medieval Italy and Flanders, because of the insecurity and impracticality of transporting large sums of money over long distances, money traders started using promissory notes. In the beginning these were personally registered, but they soon became a written order to pay the amount to whoever had it in their possession.[57] These notes can be seen as a predecessor to regular banknotes.[58]

Trade Bills of Exchange[edit]

Bills of exchange became prevalent with the expansion of European trade toward the end of the Middle Ages. A flourishing Italian wholesale trade in cloth, woolen clothing, wine, tin and other commodities was heavily dependent on credit for its rapid expansion. Goods were supplied to a buyer against a bill of exchange, which constituted the buyer's promise to make payment at some specified future date. Provided that the buyer was reputable or the bill was endorsed by a credible guarantor, the seller could then present the bill to a merchant banker and redeem it in money at a discounted value before it actually became due. The main purpose of these bills nevertheless was, that traveling with cash was particularly dangerous at the time. A deposit could be made with a banker in one town, in turn a bill of exchange was handed out, that could be redeemed in another town.

These bills could also be used as a form of payment by the seller to make additional purchases from his own suppliers. Thus, the bills – an early form of credit – became both a medium of exchange and a medium for storage of value. Like the loans made by the Egyptian grain banks, this trade credit became a significant source for the creation of new money. In England, bills of exchange became an important form of credit and money during last quarter of the 18th century and the first quarter of the 19th century before banknotes, checks and cash credit lines were widely available.[59]


The acceptance of symbolic forms of money meant that a symbol could be used to represent something of value that was available in physical storage somewhere else in space, such as grain in the warehouse; or something of value that would be available later, such as a promissory note or bill of exchange, a document ordering someone to pay a certain sum of money to another on a specific date or when certain conditions have been fulfilled.

In the 12th century, the English monarchy introduced an early version of the bill of exchange in the form of a notched piece of wood known as a tally stick. Tallies originally came into use at a time when paper was rare and costly, but their use persisted until the early 19th century, even after paper money had become prevalent. The notches denoted various amounts of taxes payable to the Crown. Initially tallies were simply a form of receipt to the taxpayer at the time of rendering his dues. As the revenue department became more efficient, they began issuing tallies to denote a promise of the tax assessee to make future tax payments at specified times during the year. Each tally consisted of a matching pair – one stick was given to the assessee at the time of assessment representing the amount of taxes to be paid later, and the other held by the Treasury representing the amount of taxes to be collected at a future date.

The Treasury discovered that these tallies could also be used to create money. When the Crown had exhausted its current resources, it could use the tally receipts representing future tax payments due to the Crown as a form of payment to its own creditors, who in turn could either collect the tax revenue directly from those assessed or use the same tally to pay their own taxes to the government. The tallies could also be sold to other parties in exchange for gold or silver coin at a discount reflecting the length of time remaining until the tax was due for payment. Thus, the tallies became an accepted medium of exchange for some types of transactions and an accepted store of value. Like the girobanks before it, the Treasury soon realized that it could also issue tallies that were not backed by any specific assessment of taxes. By doing so, the Treasury created new money that was backed by public trust and confidence in the monarchy rather than by specific revenue receipts.[60]

Goldsmith Bankers[edit]

Goldsmiths in England had been craftsmen, bullion merchants, money changers, and money lenders since the 16th century. But they were not the first to act as financial intermediates; in the early 17th century, the scriveners were the first to keep deposits for the express purpose of relending them.[61] Merchants and traders had amassed huge hoards of gold and entrusted their wealth to the Royal Mint for storage. In 1640 King Charles I seized the private gold stored in the mint as a forced loan (which was to be paid back over time). Thereafter merchants preferred to store their gold with the goldsmiths of London, who possessed private vaults, and charged a fee for that service. In exchange for each deposit of precious metal, the goldsmiths issued receipts certifying the quantity and purity of the metal they held as a bailee (i.e., in trust). These receipts could not be assigned (only the original depositor could collect the stored goods). Gradually the goldsmiths took over the function of the scriveners of relending on behalf of a depositor and also developed modern banking practices; promissory notes were issued for money deposited which by custom and/or law was a loan to the goldsmith,[62] i.e., the depositor expressly allowed the goldsmith to use the money for any purpose including advances to his customers. The goldsmith charged no fee, or even paid interest on these deposits. Since the promissory notes were payable on demand, and the advances (loans) to the goldsmith's customers were repayable over a longer time period, this was an early form of fractional reserve banking. The promissory notes developed into an assignable instrument, which could circulate as a safe and convenient form of money backed by the goldsmith's promise to pay.[63] Hence goldsmiths could advance loans in the form of gold money, or in the form of promissory notes, or in the form of checking accounts.[64] Gold deposits were relatively stable, often remaining with the goldsmith for years on end, so there was little risk of default so long as public trust in the goldsmith's integrity and financial soundness was maintained. Thus, the goldsmiths of London became the forerunners of British banking and prominent creators of new money based on credit.

Demand Deposits[edit]

Demand deposits are funds that are deposited in bank accounts and are available for withdrawal at the discretion of the depositor. The withdrawal of funds from the account does not require contacting or making any type of prior arrangements with the bank or credit union. As long as the account balance is sufficient to cover the amount of the withdrawal, and the withdrawal takes place in accordance with procedures set in place by the financial institution, the funds may be withdrawn on demand.


The first European banknotes were issued by Stockholms Banco, a predecessor of the Bank of Sweden, in 1661.[65] These replaced the copper-plates being used instead as a means of payment,[66] although in 1664 the bank ran out of coins to redeem notes and ceased operating in the same year.

Inspired by the success of the London goldsmiths, some of whom became the forerunners of great English banks, banks began issuing paper notes quite properly termed "banknotes", which circulated in the same way that government-issued currency circulates today. In England this practice continued up to 1694. Scottish banks continued issuing notes until 1850, and still do issue banknotes backed by Bank of England notes. In the United States, this practice continued through the 19th century; at one time there were more than 5,000 different types of banknotes issued by various commercial banks in America. Only the notes issued by the largest, most creditworthy banks were widely accepted. The scrip of smaller, lesser-known institutions circulated locally. Farther from home it was only accepted at a discounted rate, if at all. The proliferation of types of money went hand in hand with a multiplication in the number of financial institutions.

These banknotes were a form of representative money which could be converted into gold or silver by application at the bank. Since banks issued notes far in excess of the gold and silver they kept on deposit, sudden loss of public confidence in a bank could precipitate mass redemption of banknotes and result in bankruptcy.

The use of banknotes issued by private commercial banks as legal tender has gradually been replaced by the issuance of bank notes authorized and controlled by national governments. The Bank of England was granted sole rights to issue banknotes in England after 1694. In the United States, the Federal Reserve Bank was granted similar rights after its establishment in 1913. Until recently, these government-authorized currencies were forms of representative money, since they were partially backed by gold or silver and were theoretically convertible into gold or silver.

After 2008[edit]


The latest development in money uses cryptography to seek to ensure trust and fungibility in a theoretically tamper-proof distributed ledger called a blockchain. While several digital currency systems where proposed since the 1980s,[67] the first successful decentralized peer-to-peer cryptocurrency, bitcoin, was proposed in 2008 by an unknown author or authors under the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto.[68][69] The protocol proposed by Nakamoto solved what is known as the double-spending problem without the need of a trusted third-party.

Since bitcoin's inception, thousands of other cryptocurrencies have been introduced,[70][71] many of which use the symbology of former metallic currencies, such as silver for Litecoin.

Different Types of Money[edit]

In modern times the broader concept of "money" includes other more complicated forms of both "money of account" and "money of exchange". The different types of money are typically classified as "M"s. The "M"s usually range from M0 (narrowest) to M3 (broadest) but which "M"s are actually focused on in policy formulation depends on the country's central bank:

M0: In some countries, such as the United Kingdom, M0 includes bank reserves, so M0 is referred to as the monetary base, or narrow money.[72]

MB: is referred to as the monetary base or total currency. This is the base from which other forms of money (like checking deposits, listed below) are created and is traditionally the most liquid measure of the money supply.[73]

M1: Bank reserves are not included in M1.

M2: Represents M1 and "close substitutes" for M1.[74] M2 is a broader classification of money than M1. M2 is a key economic indicator used to forecast inflation.[75]

M3: M2 plus large and long-term deposits. Since 2006, M3 is no longer published by the U.S. central bank.[76] However, there are still estimates produced by various private institutions.

MZM: Money with zero maturity. It measures the supply of financial assets redeemable at par on demand. Velocity of MZM is historically a relatively accurate predictor of inflation.[77][78][79]

Please see Wikipedia site for more info such as images, references, bibliographies...


Money sure seems to have a stranglehold on economics and ergonomics. The American dream at what price?

Indeed, what are we to do? What can any individual do in the interest of human integrity?

Can little things make a difference, nudge us toward a healthier state of being in the long run? Is there hope for humanity in the long run?

Consider the following entries...


Life Over Money?! Greed (Social Experiment) - Homeless man vs Rich Man

Joey Salads
Published on Sep 10, 2015

Category : Entertainment
License : Standard YouTube License


c | Adam Carroll | TEDxLondonBusinessSchool

TEDx Talks
Published on Jul 9, 2015

Adam Carroll talks about his $10,000 Monopoly game with his kids and how to teach finance management in a cashless society.

Adam Carroll is quickly being recognized as one of the top transformational trainers in the country. Having presented at over 500 colleges and Universities nationwide, hundreds of leadership symposiums, and countless local and regional organizations, Adam Carroll’s message of Building A Bigger Life, Not a Bigger Lifestyle has been heard by over 200,000+ people.

In early 2014, Adam successfully crowd-funded a documentary on student loan debt, raising nearly $70,000 in 45 days. The film, Broke Busted & Disgusted is due out in early 2015 and is already garnering critical acclaim. The mission of the film is to start a national debate about changing the way we fund college and not crippling 20 somethings with mountains of debt.

Adam’s core message is we are all after the same thing – to relentlessly pursue our passions, live simply and happily, and make a difference to those around us.

This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at

Category: Nonprofits & Activism
License : Standard YouTube License


Money Quotes:
Courtesy of:

Nowadays nothing but money counts: a fortune brings honors, friendships; the poor man everywhere lies low.

Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like nobody's watching.
Satchel Paige

Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.
P. J. O'Rourke

Encouragement to others is something everyone can give. Somebody needs what you have to give. It may not be your money; it may be your time. It may be your listening ear. It may be your arms to encourage. It may be your smile to uplift. Who knows?
Joel Osteen

Money doesn't mean anything to me. I've made a lot of money, but I want to enjoy life and not stress myself building my bank account. I give lots away and live simply, mostly out of a suitcase in hotels. We all know that good health is much more important.
Keanu Reeves

Innovation has nothing to do with how many R & D dollars you have. When Apple came up with the Mac, IBM was spending at least 100 times more on R & D. It's not about money. It's about the people you have, how you're led, and how much you get it.
Steve Jobs

An athlete cannot run with money in his pockets. He must run with hope in his heart and dreams in his head.
Emil Zatopek

The only way to get love is to be lovable. It's very irritating if you have a lot of money. You'd like to think you could write a check: 'I'll buy a million dollars' worth of love.' But it doesn't work that way. The more you give love away, the more you get.
Warren Buffett

If my fans want to do something for me when that time comes, I say, don't waste your money on me. Help the homeless. Help the needy... people who don't have no food... Instead of some big funeral, where they come from here and there and all over. Save it.
B. B. King

If we pollute the air, water and soil that keep us alive and well, and destroy the biodiversity that allows natural systems to function, no amount of money will save us.
David Suzuki


Money Humour:

NOT having enough money to pay your bills is no laughing matter. Yet laughter is one of the best ways to release tension, forget worries, and take a break from it all.

The Terrifying Cost of "Free” Websites

Published on Dec 7, 2016

Category: Comedy
License : Standard YouTube License


Published on Apr 20, 2017

Category: Comedy
License : Standard YouTube License

The Shocking Way Private Prisons Make Money

Published on Nov 23, 2016

Category: Comedy
License : Standard YouTube License


Comedian fk / Comedy
Published on Jul 11, 2017

Category: Comedy
License : Standard YouTube License


Thematic Music:

Donald Trump entrance theme - Money, Money, Money

Published on Apr 7, 2013

Category : Music
License : Standard YouTube License

NOTE: By embedding YouTube videos on our site, UFF agrees to YouTube API Terms of Service.

For the love of money - O' jays Full Version

I am Max
Published on Jul 13, 2009

Edit: The bottom bar is as a result of a re-upload on Youtube's part. The video was originally uploaded in 2009 and had since been taken down. In the second quarter of 2014 it was put back up and thus the bottom bar exists.

All visual credits go to Google images and Istockphoto.
Audio clip credits goes to the O'jays and Sony music entertainment
This video is purely fan made.

Album : The O'Jays - The Very Best Of
Licensed by : SME (on behalf of Legacy Recordings); SOLAR Music Rights Management, CMRRA, PEDL, MijacCatalog, Warner Chappell, Sony ATV Publishing, UBEM, and 5 Music Rights Societies

Category : Entertainment
License : Standard YouTube License

Pink Floyd - Money (Official Music Video)

Pink Floyd
Published on Jun 25, 2014

Category : Music
License : Standard YouTube License

The Beaches - Money

Published on Aug 14, 2017

Made possible with the support of the Ontario Media Development Corporation.

Music video by The Beaches performing Money. (C) 2017 Universal Music Canada Inc.

Category : Music
License : Standard YouTube License

Flying Lizzards - Money Thats What I Want 1979

Published on Aug 5, 2009

Category: Music
License : Standard YouTube License
Song: Money
Artist: The Flying Lizards
Album: The Flying Lizards
Writers: Janie Bradford, Berry Gordy
Licensed to YouTube by: UMG (on behalf of Zonophone); CMRRA, Imagem Music (publishing) US, EMI Music Publishing, SOLAR Music Rights Management, UBEM, and 4 Music Rights Societies

The Notorious B.I.G. - "Mo Money Mo Problems"

The Notorious B.I.G.
Published on Sep 6, 2011

Category: Music
License : Standard YouTube License
Song: Mo Money Mo Problems (feat. Mase & Puff Daddy) [2014 Remastered
Artist: The Notorious B.I.G.
Album: Life After Death (Remastered Edition) [Amended]
Licensed by: WMG (on behalf of Rhino Atlantic); CMRRA, Sony ATV Publishing, SOLAR Music Rights Management, Warner Chappell, ASCAP, UBEM, EMI Music Publishing, PEDL, and 14 Music Rights Societies

O Brother, Where Art Thou? - Constant Sorrow [HD]

Published on Mar 14, 2016

Category: Film & Animation
Movie: O Brother, Where Art Thou?

Sam Cooke A Change Is Gonna Come 1964 HD Max 720p

Starte Christ
Published on Aug 23, 2017

Category: Music
License : Standard YouTube License
Artist & Writer: Sam Cooke

Licensed by : UMG (on behalf of ABKCO Music and Records, Inc.); Warner Chappell, SOLAR Music Rights Management, EMI Music Publishing, UBEM, ABKCO Music, Inc., and 15 Music Rights Societies

METRIC - Breathing Underwater [Official Video]

Published on Nov 14, 2012

Category: Music
License : Standard YouTube License
Album: Synthetica (Deluxe)
Licensed by: Believe Music, UMG, ONErpm, Live Nation Video Network (on behalf of LAB 344); CMRRA, ARESA, ASCAP, BMG Rights Management, and 12 Music Rights Societies

Arkells - People's Champ

Arkells Music
Published on May 23, 2018

Arkells - People's Champ. © 2018 Arkells Music (2017) Inc.

Category: Music
License : Standard YouTube License
Artist : Arkells
Album : People's Champ
Licensed by : UMG, Koch Entertainment (on behalf of Last Gang)


Kids decide between helping the Homeless or Ice Cream

Meir Kay
Published on May 27, 2015

We gave 4 - 6 year old's a dollar and observed how they went about spending it.

Category : Entertainment
License : Standard YouTube License

What more do we need to know?

How about we all get together in the middle?

Calling on all American and other Earthly lovers of what is just and fair when it comes to money and all other
economic expressions, including love and compassion!

After all is said and done, can we afford to neglect the emotional needs of one and all?

America - Sister Golden Hair (HQ Original)

UFF Question:

Women, are you out there?

Can we save ourselves from the seemingly inevitable folly of male chauvinistic dropped on their heads BS remnants of the past, trillion dollar corporate rip off investments in paranoidal, delusional, hippocratic oath notwithstanding?

Published on Apr 18, 2011

America's 1975 hit "Sister Golden Hair", enjoy.

Category : Music
Song: Sister Golden Hair
Artist: America
Album: Hearts (US Internet Release)
Licensed to YouTube by: WMG (on behalf of Rhino Warner); Warner Chappell, PEDL, UBEM, CMRRA, ASCAP, and 7 Music Rights Societies

Pink Floyd - Shine On You Crazy Diamond I-IX

Published on Aug 1, 2016

A fantastic journey through Scotland...
pictures and videos taken from my journeys to Scotland between 2011-2016.

Category: Music


Published on May 15, 2015

Music Video: The Thrill Is Gone - B.B. King 1969 (Single, Album: Completely Well)
The Thrill Is Gone - B.B. King & Eric Clapton 2010
"Crossroads Guitar Festival' Live Concert at Toyota Park in Bridgeview, Chicago 2010 USA
Blues Song Written by Roy Hawkins and Rick Darnell in 1951 (West Coast Blues Musician)

Category: Music

So what are we here for beyond thills?

Figure it out people before it's too late!

Better still, let's figure it out together, as in -

The thrill of life evolves!

Ain't it good to be alive?

Edwin - Alive

Published on Sep 7, 2006

Music video for 'Alive'.

Category: Music


DISCLAIMER: UFF does not own any of the above works, nor do we claim responsibility or ownership for any images or audio tracks shown in these and other videos UFF has posted. All rights go to their respective owners.


UFF Commentary Notes are the sole responsibility of the President of UFF.

See post of November 29, 2017 for full transparency details.


Experiencial ergonomics. Discuss.


Success and Luck, Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy - The Book * UFF Commentary * Detailed Definitions * Book Review * Luck Humour and Quotes * Related Thematic Music * Don't Follow Your Passion * 24 Things That Are More Likely to Happen Than Winning the Lottery; Reverse Lottery * WARREN BUFFETT on Being at the Right Place Right Time and Luck With Wealth

Success and Luck, Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy - The Book * UFF Commentary * Detailed Definitions * Book Review * Luck Humour and Quotes * Related Thematic Music * Don't Follow Your Passion * 24 Things That Are More Likely to Happen Than Winning the Lottery;  Reverse Lottery * WARREN BUFFETT on Being at the Right Place Right Time and Luck With Wealth

UFF Commentary:

Is it fair to say that all people have potential from birth to develop, earn and deserve praise (merit)?


the quality of being particularly good or worthy, especially so as to deserve praise or reward.
"composers of outstanding merit"
synonyms: excellence · goodness · standard · quality · level · grade · high quality ·

deserve or be worthy of (something, especially reward, punishment, or attention).
"the results have been encouraging enough to merit further investigation"
synonyms: deserve · earn · be deserving of · warrant · rate · justify · be worthy of ·

"Merit" as a word search courtesy of BING. See the following post (Definitions) for more details on meritocracy.


And are we not all lucky to be alive, here and now, no-matter how precarious our current situation?



success or failure apparently brought by chance rather than through one's own actions.
"it was just luck that the first kick went in" ·
synonyms: good fortune · good luck · success · successfulness · prosperity ·

(luck into/onto)
chance to find or acquire.
"he lucked into a disc-jockey job"

"Luck" as a word search courtesy of BING. Once again: See the following post (Definitions) for more details on being lucky.


And what about success? How successful do we need to be to feel fulfilled?


Related Idiom and Slang:

1. Idiom: Nothing Succeeds Like Success
Courtesy of

Initial success provides the resources and fosters the circumstances for further success. After their surprise championship victory, the team was suddenly flooded with support from the state and went on to become a powerhouse in the region. Nothing succeeds like success, as they say.
Farlex Dictionary of Idioms. © 2015 Farlex, Inc, all rights reserved.

Prov. If you have succeeded in the past, you will continue to be successful in the future. After Alan's brilliant courtroom victory, everyone wanted to be his client. Nothing succeeds like success.
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.


And how much luck do we need or deserve? What kind of luck do we yearn for, as there are variations, such as -

2. Slang: Like (lucky as) a dog with two dicks
Courtesy of

Happy, as a dog would be if it found it had an extra penis.


If there is ever to be a healthy, vibrant, rich, earth-based Utopian future for humanity (warts and all), will it be based on meritocracy? And need all meritocracies necessarily be based on and/or evolve into elitist hierarchies? Or can there be a more egalitarian, humanistic, Utopian, merit-based solution to resolving current, ongoing social/political/economic inequalities? A meritocracy of and for one and all! That would call for equal rights and opportunities writ large in a society currently, seemingly hell-bent on winner-take-all selfish purposes.

And what part would luck play if a modern, functional version of Utopia is to exist beyond fiction and mythology?


Here's an observation/objective Robert Frank offers in the Preface of his book:

"The claims I'll defend in the pages ahead are ambitious - that successful people tend to understate luck's role in their success, making them reluctant to support the kinds of public investments without which everyone becomes less likely to succeed; and that a relatively simple, un-intrusive change in public policy could free up more than enough resources to redress this investment shortfall."
Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy, Robert H. Frank, Princeton University Press, 2016. Preface, Page xvi.

Put another way from another perspective:

Wouldn't it be nice if we could all get bailed out of trouble like those lucky bankers and derivatives junkies after the 2008 financial crash?

OK, so -

If we are to truly appreciate and objectify the full depth and meaning of the book "Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy", we need first start with detailed definitions and related history of the words "meritocracy" and "luck".


Detailed Definitions:

Meritocracy Defined
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Meritocracy (merit, from Latin mereō, and -cracy, from Ancient Greek κράτος kratos "strength, power") is a political philosophy which holds that certain things, such as economic goods or power, should be vested in individuals on the basis of talent, effort and achievement.[1] Advancement in such a system is based on performance, as measured through examination or demonstrated achievement. Although the concept of meritocracy has existed for centuries, the term itself was first created in 1958 by the sociologist Michael Young[2].

Early definitions[edit]

The "most common definition of meritocracy conceptualizes merit in terms of tested competency and ability, and most likely, as measured by IQ or standardized achievement tests."[3] In government and other administrative systems, "meritocracy" refers to a system under which advancement within the system turns on "merits", like intelligence, credentials, and education. These are often determined through evaluations or examinations.[2]

In a more general sense, meritocracy can refer to any form of evaluation based on achievement. Like "utilitarian" and "pragmatic", the word "meritocratic" has also developed a broader connotation, and is sometimes used to refer to any government run by "a ruling or influential class of educated or able people."[4]

This is in contrast to the original, condemnatory use of the term in 1958 by Michael Young in his work "The Rise of the Meritocracy", who was satirizing the ostensibly merit-based Tripartite System of education practiced in the United Kingdom at the time; he claimed that, in the Tripartite System, "merit is equated with intelligence-plus-effort, its possessors are identified at an early age and selected for appropriate intensive education, and there is an obsession with quantification, test-scoring, and qualifications."[5]

Meritocracy in its wider sense, may be any general act of judgment upon the basis of various demonstrated merits; such acts frequently are described in sociology and psychology. Supporters of meritocracy do not necessarily agree on the nature of "merit"; however, they do tend to agree that "merit" itself should be a primary consideration during evaluation. Thus, the merits may extend beyond intelligence and education to any mental or physical talent or to work ethic. As such meritocracy may be based on character or innate abilities. Meritocrats therefore reject evaluation on the basis of race, wealth, family circumstances, and similar criteria.

In rhetoric, the demonstration of one's merit regarding mastery of a particular subject is an essential task most directly related to the Aristotelian term Ethos. The equivalent Aristotelian conception of meritocracy is based upon aristocratic or oligarchical structures, rather than in the context of the modern state.[6][7]

More recent definitions[edit]

In the United States, the assassination of President James A. Garfield in 1881 prompted the replacement of the American Spoils System with a meritocracy. In 1883, The Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act was passed, stipulating government jobs should be awarded on the basis of merit through competitive exams, rather than ties to politicians or political affiliation.[8]

The most common form of meritocratic screening found today is the college degree. Higher education is an imperfect meritocratic screening system for various reasons, such as lack of uniform standards worldwide,[9][10] lack of scope (not all occupations and processes are included), and lack of access (some talented people never have an opportunity to participate because of the expense, most especially in developing countries).[11] Nonetheless, academic degrees serve some amount of meritocratic screening purpose in the absence of a more refined methodology. Education alone, however, does not constitute a complete system, as meritocracy must automatically confer power and authority, which a degree does not accomplish independently.


Although the concept has existed for centuries, the term "meritocracy" is relatively new. It was used pejoratively by British politician and sociologist Michael Young in his 1958 satirical essay[2][12][13][14][15] The Rise of the Meritocracy, which pictured the United Kingdom under the rule of a government favouring intelligence and aptitude (merit) above all else, being the combination of the root of Latin origin "merit" (from "mereō" meaning "earn") and the Ancient Greek suffix "-cracy" (meaning "power", "rule").[16] In this book the term had distinctly negative connotations as Young questioned both the legitimacy of the selection process used to become a member of this elite and the outcomes of being ruled by such a narrowly defined group. The essay, written in the first person by a fictional historical narrator in 2034, interweaves history from the politics of pre- and post-war Britain with those of fictional future events in the short (1960 onward) and long term (2020 onward).[17]

The essay was based upon the tendency of the then-current governments, in their striving toward intelligence, to ignore shortcomings and upon the failure of education systems to utilize correctly the gifted and talented members within their societies.[18]

Young's fictional narrator explains that, on the one hand, the greatest contributor to society is not the "stolid mass" or majority, but the "creative minority" or members of the "restless elite".[19] On the other hand, he claims that there are casualties of progress whose influence is underestimated and that, from such stolid adherence to natural science and intelligence, arises arrogance and complacency.[19] This problem is encapsulated in the phrase "Every selection of one is a rejection of many".[19]

It was also used by Hannah Arendt in her essay "Crisis in Education",[20] which was written in 1958 and refers to the use of meritocracy in the English educational system. She too uses the term pejoratively. It was not until 1972 that Daniel Bell used the term positively.[21]


Ancient times: China[edit]

According to scholarly consensus, the earliest example of an administrative meritocracy, based on civil service examinations, dates back to Ancient China.[22][23][24][25][a] The concept originates, at least by the sixth century BC, when it was advocated by the Chinese philosopher Confucius, who "invented the notion that those who govern should do so because of merit, not of inherited status. This sets in motion the creation of the imperial examinations and bureaucracies open only to those who passed tests."[26]

As the Qin and Han dynasties developed a meritocratic system in order to maintain power over a large, sprawling empire, it became necessary for the government to maintain a complex network of officials.[27] Prospective officials could come from a rural background and government positions were not restricted to the nobility. Rank was determined by merit, through the civil service examinations, and education became the key for social mobility.[27] After the fall of the Han Dynasty, the nine-rank system was established during the Three Kingdoms period.
According to the Princeton Encyclopedia on American History:[28]

One of the oldest examples of a merit-based civil service system existed in the imperial bureaucracy of China. Tracing back to 200 B.C., the Han Dynasty adopted Confucianism as the basis of its political philosophy and structure, which included the revolutionary idea of replacing nobility of blood with one of virtue and honesty, and thereby calling for administrative appointments to be based solely on merit. This system allowed anyone who passed an examination to become a government officer, a position that would bring wealth and honor to the whole family. In part due to Chinese influence, the first European civil service did not originate in Europe, but rather in India by the British-run East India Company... company managers hired and promoted employees based on competitive examinations in order to prevent corruption and favoritism.

Both Plato and Aristotle advocated meritocracy, Plato in his The Republic, arguing that the most wise should rule, and hence the rulers should be philosopher kings.[29]

17th century: spread to Europe[edit]

The concept of meritocracy spread from China to British India during the seventeenth century, and then into continental Europe and the United States.[28] With the translation of Confucian texts during the Enlightenment, the concept of a meritocracy reached intellectuals in the West, who saw it as an alternative to the traditional ancient regime of Europe.[30] Voltaire and François Quesnay wrote favourably of the idea, with Voltaire claiming that the Chinese had "perfected moral science" and Quesnay advocating an economic and political system modeled after that of the Chinese.[30]

The first European power to implement a successful meritocratic civil service was the British Empire, in their administration of India: "company managers hired and promoted employees based on competitive examinations in order to prevent corruption and favoritism."[28] British colonial administrators advocated the spread of the system to the rest of the commonwealth, the most "persistent" of which was Thomas Taylor Meadows, Britain's consul in Guangzhou, China. Meadows successfully argued in his Desultory Notes on the Government and People of China, published in 1847, that "the long duration of the Chinese empire is solely and altogether owing to the good government which consists in the advancement of men of talent and merit only," and that the British must reform their civil service by making the institution meritocratic.[31] This practice later was adopted in the late nineteenth century by the British mainland, inspired by "Chinese mandarin system."[32]

The British philosopher and polymath John Stuart Mill advocated meritocracy in his book, Considerations on Representative Government. His model was to give more votes to the more educated voter. His views are explained in Estlund (2003:57–58):

Mill's proposal of plural voting has two motives. One is to prevent one group or class of people from being able to control the political process even without having to give reasons in order to gain sufficient support. He calls this the problem of class legislation. Since the most numerous class is also at a lower level of education and social rank, this could be partly remedied by giving those at the higher ranks plural votes. A second, and equally prominent motive for plural voting is to avoid giving equal influence to each person without regard to their merit, intelligence, etc. He thinks that it is fundamentally important that political institutions embody, in their spirit, the recognition that some opinions are worth more than others. He does not say that this is a route to producing better political decisions, but it is hard to understand his argument, based on this second motive, in any other way.

So, if Aristotle is right that the deliberation is best if participants are numerous (and assuming for simplicity that the voters are the deliberators) then this is a reason for giving all or many citizens a vote, but this does not yet show that the wiser subset should not have, say, two or three; in that way something would be given both to the value of the diverse perspectives, and to the value of the greater wisdom of the few. This combination of the Platonic and Aristotelian points is part of what I think is so formidable about Mill's proposal of plural voting. It is also an advantage of his view that he proposes to privilege not the wise, but the educated. Even if we agreed that the wise should rule, there is a serious problem about how to identify them. This becomes especially important if a successful political justification must be generally acceptable to the ruled. In that case, privileging the wise would require not only their being so wise as to be better rulers, but also, and more demandingly, that their wisdom be something that can be agreed to by all reasonable citizens. I turn to this conception of justification below.

Mill's position has great plausibility: good education promotes the ability of citizens to rule more wisely. So, how can we deny that the educated subset would rule more wisely than others. But then why shouldn't they have more votes?

Estlund goes on to criticize Mill's education-based meritocracy on various grounds.

19th century[edit]

In the United States, the federal bureaucracy used the Spoils System from 1828 until the assassination of United States President James A. Garfield by a disappointed office seeker in 1881 proved its dangers. Two years later in 1883, the system of appointments to the United States Federal Bureaucracy was revamped by the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, partially based on the British meritocratic civil service that had been established years earlier. The act stipulated that government jobs should be awarded on the basis of merit, through competitive exams, rather than ties to politicians or political affiliation. It also made it illegal to fire or demote government employees for political reasons.[8]

To enforce the merit system and the judicial system, the law also created the United States Civil Service Commission.[8] In the modern American meritocracy, the president may hand out only a certain number of jobs, which must be approved by the Senate.

Australia began establishing public universities in the 1850s with the goal of promoting meritocracy by providing advanced training and credentials. The educational system was set up to service urban males of middle-class background, but of diverse social and religious origins. It was increasingly extended to all graduates of the public school system, those of rural and regional background, and then to women and finally to ethnic minorities.[33] Both the middle classes and the working classes have promoted the ideal of meritocracy within a strong commitment to "mate-ship" and political equality.[34]

20th century to today[edit]

Singapore describes meritocracy as one of its official guiding principles for domestic public policy formulation, placing emphasis on academic credentials as objective measures of merit.[35]

There is criticism that, under this system, Singaporean society is being increasingly stratified and that an elite class is being created from a narrow segment of the population.[36] Singapore has a growing level of tutoring for children,[37] and top tutors are often paid better than school teachers.[37][38][39] Defendants[who?] recall the ancient Chinese proverb "Wealth does not pass three generations" (Chinese: 富不过三代), suggesting that the nepotism or cronyism of elitists eventually will be, and often are, replaced by those lower down the hierarchy.
Singaporean academics are continuously re-examining the application of meritocracy as an ideological tool and how it's stretched to encompass the ruling party's objectives. Professor Kenneth Paul Tan at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy asserts that "Meritocracy, in trying to 'isolate' merit by treating people with fundamentally unequal backgrounds as superficially the same, can be a practice that ignores and even conceals the real advantages and disadvantages that are unevenly distributed to different segments of an inherently unequal society, a practice that in fact perpetuates this fundamental inequality. In this way, those who are picked by meritocracy as having merit may already have enjoyed unfair advantages from the very beginning, ignored according to the principle of nondiscrimination."[40]

Meritocracy in the Singapore context relates to the application of pragmatism as an ideological device which combines strict adherence to market principles without any aversion to social engineering and little propensity for classical social welfarism,[41] is further illustrated by Kenneth Paul Tan in subsequent articles:

There is a strong ideological quality in Singapore's pragmatism, and a strongly pragmatic quality in ideological negotiations within the dynamics of hegemony. In this complex relationship, the combination of ideological and pragmatic maneuvering over the decades has resulted in the historical dominance of government by the PAP in partnership with global capital whose interests have been advanced without much reservation.[42]

Within the Ecuadorian Ministry of Labor, the Ecuadorian Meritocracy Institute[43] was created under the technical advice of the Singapore government.

Most contemporary political theorists, including John Rawls, reject the ideal of meritocracy.[44] However, in recent years, Thomas Mulligan has defended meritocracy.[45][46][47] He argues that a just society is one in which there is equal opportunity and people are judged on their merits.

Please refer to the Wikipedia site for more details on meritocracy including footnotes and references.


Luck Defined
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Luck is the experience of notably positive, negative, or improbable events. The naturalistic interpretation is that positive and negative events happen all the time in human lives, both due to random and non-random natural and artificial processes, and that even improbable events can happen by random chance. In this view, being "lucky" or "unlucky" is simply a descriptive label that points out an event's positivity, negativity, or improbability.

Supernatural interpretations of luck consider it to be an attribute of a person or object, or the result of a favorable or unfavorable view of a deity upon a person. These interpretations often prescribe how luckiness or unluckiness can be obtained, such as by carrying a lucky charm or making sacrifices or prayers to a deity. Saying someone is "born lucky" then might mean, depending on the interpretation, anything from that they have been born into a good family or circumstance, or that they habitually experience improbably positive events due to some inherent property or the lifelong favor of a god or goddess in a monotheistic or polytheistic religion.

Many superstitions are related to luck, though these are often specific to a given culture or set of related cultures, and sometimes contradictory. For example, lucky symbols include the number 7 in Christian-influenced cultures, but the number 8 in Chinese-influenced cultures. Unlucky symbols and events include entering and leaving a house by different doors in Greek culture, throwing rocks into the wind in Navajo culture, and ravens in Western culture. Some of these associations may derive from related facts or desires. For example, in Western culture opening an umbrella indoors might be considered unlucky partly because it could poke someone in the eye, whereas shaking hands with a chimney sweep might be considered lucky partly because it is a kind but unpleasant thing to do given the dirty nature of their work. In Chinese culture, the association of the number 4 as a homophone with the word for death may explain why it is considered unlucky. Extremely complicated and sometimes contradictory systems for prescribing auspicious and inauspicious times and arrangements of things have been devised, for example feng shui in Chinese culture and systems of astrology in various cultures around the world.

Many polytheistic religions have specific gods or goddesses that are associated with luck, including Fortuna and Felicitas in the Ancient Roman religion (the former related to the words "fortunate" and "unfortunate" in English), Dedun in Nubian religion, the Seven Lucky Gods in Japanese mythology, mythical American serviceman John Frum in Polynesian cargo cults, and the inauspicious Alakshmi in Hinduism.

Etymology and Definition[edit]

The English noun luck appears comparatively late, during the 1480s, as a loan from Low German, Dutch or Frisian luk, a short form of gelucke (Middle High German gelücke). Compare to old Slavic word lukyj (лукый) - appointed by destiny and old Russian luchaj (лучаи) - destiny, fortune. It likely entered English as a gambling term, and the context of gambling remains detectable in the word's connotations; luck is a way of understanding a personal chance event. Luck has three aspects:[1][2][3]

Luck is good or bad.[4]
Luck is the result of chance.[5]
Luck applies to a sentient being.

Before the adoption of luck at the end of the Middle Ages, Old English and Middle English expressed the notion of "good fortune" with the word speed (Middle English spede, Old English spēd); speed besides "good fortune" had the wider meaning of "prosperity, profit, abundance"; it is not associated with the notion of probability or chance but rather with that of fate or divine help; a bestower of success can also be called speed, as in "Christ be our speed" (William Robertson, Phraseologia generalis, 1693).

The notion of probability was expressed by the Latin loanword chance, adopted in Middle English from the late 13th century, literally describing an outcome as a "falling" (as it were of dice), via Old French cheance from Late Latin cadentia "falling". Fortuna, the Roman goddess of fate or luck, was popular an allegory in medieval times, and even though it was not strictly reconcilable with Christian theology, it became popular in learned circles of the High Middle Ages to portray her as a servant of God in distributing success or failure in a characteristically "fickle" or unpredictable way, thus introducing the notion of chance.

Please refer to the Wikipedia site for full details on luck, including Interpretations (i.e. as Lack of Control, as a Fallacy, as an Essence, as a Self-Fulfilling Prophesy); Social Aspects (i.e. Games, Lotteries, Numerology, Science); In Religion and Mythology, along with footnotes, bibliography and extensive references.


Book Review:

Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy, Robert H. Frank, Princeton University Press, 2016.

Here's the book review written by Dan McArthur. as published courtesy of LSE Review of Books

What role does luck play in economic success? In Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy, Robert H. Frank argues that the wealthy tend to underestimate the role that chance plays in acquiring status and money, and explores how this consequently discourages support of taxation. While this short read could draw upon other discussions of luck to bolster its key claims, this is a convincing and engagingly written work, writes Dan McArthur.

Consider the owner and founder of a successful business. Did they make it all on their own, through hard work, dedication and talent, or did luck play a role in their success? Hard work and talent might be needed to identify an untapped market or a revolutionary business model, but our businessperson still required luck of several kinds. They were lucky that another entrepreneur didn’t get there first, or that an established company was unable to muscle in on their business. However, they were also lucky to be born in an affluent society where they could be educated for free in publicly funded schools, and where governments have invested in the roads on which their products are transported and in a police force to prevent their wealth from being stolen.

In Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy, Robert H. Frank argues that wealthy people fail to appreciate the central role that luck plays in their success, and are thus unwilling to support taxation to fund public infrastructure that benefits everyone. Frank is an economist at Cornell University and a columnist for the New York Times, and is well known for popularising the idea of the ‘winner-take-all society’.

Success and Luck is written in a clear, engaging and personable style, not least because it is littered with anecdotes and stories illustrating the huge effects that tiny chance events can have. I found examples from Frank’s own life especially compelling. These include two near-death experiences – a heart attack and a windsurfing accident – as examples of how tiny contingencies can quite literally have life and death implications. The book also discusses more systematic evidence of the role of luck, such as the effects of the month in which someone happens to be born on their chances of becoming a CEO or a professional athlete. More generally (as Branko Milanovic argues), at least half of the variance of incomes across the world is explained by two factors: the mean income per capita and level of inequality in the country in which an individual happens to live. Being born in the right country has a huge impact on the success you can expect to have.

For Frank, luck is especially important to economic success in the era of ‘winner-take-all markets’. This term refers to a situation where transportation and communications technology increases the competitiveness of markets and, in doing so, allows the producers of the best products to capture the entire market. One of Frank’s examples is the way in which local accountancy firms have gradually been superseded by franchised services, and then by tax software. Where once the best accountant in a given town would have served only the richest customers in that particular town, now the producer of the best tax software can sell their product across the world.

In winner-take-all markets, there are more people competing to provide the best product, and the winner can take the entire prize themselves. Frank argues that under such circumstances, ability and effort are important, but so is luck. He uses mathematical simulations to show that, as contests get larger, luck becomes more important in determining the outcome, and the winner of the contest is less likely to be the most ‘skilful’ but rather the luckiest.

Drawing on behavioural economics and psychology, Frank discusses some of the cognitive biases that lead successful people to fail to appreciate the role of luck in their success. It seems to be harder to delay gratification and self-motivate if you believe that luck, rather than effort, plays an important role in your life. But overlooking the role of luck makes successful people more hostile to paying taxes. For Frank, in the US at least, this unwillingness to support higher taxes is seriously damaging physical and social infrastructure, including the roads, railways and public education on which the entire population depends. This under-investment in public goods is harmful even to the most successful members of a society, because they also benefit from public goods. The analogy he uses is that it is better to drive a $150,000 Porsche on well-maintained roads than a $333,000 Ferrari on a road full of potholes.

Frank’s solution to this chronic underinvestment depends on his view that consumption is shaped by frames of reference. What people consume is shaped by norms and expectations that depend on what those around them are consuming. In Frank’s view, consumption choices are socially shaped to the extent that if you taxed everyone more (above some minimum threshold), people’s happiness would not change much because they would maintain their relative position in the income hierarchy. He argues that his proposed solution to chronic under-investment – a progressive consumption tax – will not actually harm the rich very much, because the consumption of all of the rich is scaled down – the richest person can still afford the house with the best view, and the second richest person can afford the house with the second best view.

Success and Luck is a short book. There are some really interesting aspects of luck that Frank doesn’t discuss. For example, the philosophers Bernard Williams and Thomas Nagel have argued that the central role of luck in people’s lives can seriously challenge common-sense beliefs about morally holding people to account for their actions. Another issue worth exploring is the role of beliefs about luck in attitudes towards poverty: people are much more supportive of welfare payments aimed at people who are seen as being in poverty through no fault of their own.

One possible criticism of the book is that Frank assumes that people need to be talented and hard-working, as well as lucky, to be successful. This may understate the role that social background can play in getting access to prestigious jobs and opportunities – both the class-, race- and gender-based advantages of ‘looking the part’ [4] as well as inheritance and nepotism. However, if the job of this book is to convince our hypothetical entrepreneur to support higher taxes, then Frank has pitched his arguments pretty well.

Dan McArthur is a PhD student in the LSE Department of Sociology and the LSE International Inequalities Institute. His research investigates the relationship between economic inequality and the stigmatisation of people in poverty in public opinion. Dan holds an MSc in Sociology from LSE, and a BA in Philosophy, Politics and Economics from the University of Oxford. His broader academic interests include the study of social class, comparative political economy, the philosophy of social science and sociological debates about immigration and multiculturalism.

Note: Note: This review gives the views of the author, and not the position of the LSE Review of Books blog, or of the London School of Economics.

Copyright 2013 LSE Review of Books


Luck Humour:

Well, do you feel lucky? Lucky enough to enjoy laughter?

Dirty Harry Do You ( I ) Feel Lucky Punk?

Published on Dec 8, 2011

Category: Entertainment
License: Standard YouTube License

Bad Luck Compilation

Published on Oct 13, 2017

Category: Entertainment
License: Standard YouTube License

Good Luck Everyone - Blackadder - BBC

BBC Studios
Published on May 24, 2010

Category: Entertainment
License: Standard YouTube License

Luke Is All By Himself (Star Wars - The Force Awakens - Alternate Ending Parody)

Published on Apr 29, 2016

Category: Comedy
License: Standard YouTube License


Luck Quotes:

As Warren Buffet once said: "Someone is sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time ago."
Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy, Robert H. Frank, Princeton University Press, 2016. 1. Write What You Know, Page 12

The following quotes are courtesy of:

Luck is great, but most of life is hard work.
Iain Duncan Smith

Shallow men believe in luck. Strong men believe in cause and effect.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

I believe that we all have a responsibility to give back. No one becomes successful without lots of hard work, support from others, and a little luck. Giving back creates a virtuous cycle that makes everyone more successful.
Ron Conway

The public health of five million children should not be left to luck or chance.
Jamie Oliver

I don't believe in luck. Not in golf, anyway. There are good bounces and bad bounces, sure, but the ball is round and so is the hole. If you find yourself in a position where you hope for luck to pull you through, you're in serious trouble.
Jack Nicklaus

Luck? I don't know anything about luck. I've never banked on it and I'm afraid of people who do. Luck to me is something else: Hard work - and realizing what is opportunity and what isn't.
Lucille Ball

There is no such thing in the world as luck. There never was a man who could go out in the morning and find a purse full of gold in the street to-day, and another to-morrow, and so on, day after day: He may do so once in his life; but so far as mere luck is concerned, he is as liable to lose it as to find it.
PT Barnum

Luck is a matter of preparation meeting opportunity.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

The way my luck is running, if I was a politician I would be honest.
Rodney Dangerfield

Good night, and good luck.
Edward R. Murrow


Rolling Stones - Tumbling Dice (From "Ladies & Gentlemen" DVD & Blu-Ray)

Eagle Rock
Published on Sep 2, 2010

Category: Music
License: Standard YouTube License

House of the Rising Sun | The Voice | Blind auditions | Worldwide

Princesse Jenna
Published on Nov 14, 2015

Category: People & Blogs
License: Standard YouTube License

Suggested by: Talpa_TheVoice

Bob Seger System "Ramblin Gamblin Man" Live "Turn-On" 1970

Resurrection Productions
Published on Feb 15, 2015

Category: Music
License: Standard YouTube License

Bad Company - Shooting Star

Published on Jul 21, 2011

Label: Swan Song
Copyright: Warner Music Group

Category: Music
License Standard YouTube License

Yes - Owner of a Lonely Heart (Official Music Video)

Published on Dec 24, 2013

Song: Owner Of A Lonely Heart
Artist: Yes
Album: Owner Of A Lonely Heart
Writers: Chris Squire, Jon Anderson, Trevor Horn, Trevor Rabin
Licensed to YouTube by: WMG (on behalf of Atlantic P&D); BMG Rights Management, Abramus Digital, Downtown Music Publishing, Sony ATV Publishing, ARESA, Exploration Group (Music Publishing), UBEM, Warner Chappell, PEDL, and 18 Music Rights Societies

Steve Winwood - 01 While You See A Chance (Vinyl LP)

UFF Commentary: This is one of the best audio versions available although there are other listening/viewing options including live performances from the past.

Published on Nov 13, 2010

From the LP 'Arc Of A Diver'
1980 Island (Warner Bros.) Records Ltd.

Category: Education
License: Standard YouTube License

Birtles Shorrock,Goble formerly Little River Band (It's a Long Way There) From the Full Circle DVD

Published on Mar 11, 2011

Great Quality copy of Birtles, Shorrock, Goble from their Melbourne concert.

Category: Music
License: Standard YouTube License


Don't Follow Your Passion

UFF Commentary:

Follow your passion or get a day job.

What do you think?!

Here below are actual public commentaries followed by the video.


Published on Jun 6, 2016

Should you follow your passion, wherever it may take you? Should you do only what you love...or learn to love what you do? How can you identify which path to take? How about which paths to avoid? TV personality Mike Rowe, star of "Dirty Jobs" and "Somebody's Gotta Do It," shares the dirty truth in PragerU's 2016 commencement address.

Einstein worked "passionately" on his equations at night WHILE working as a Swiss patent clerk as his day job. AFTER I've diligently planted and tended the wheat fields, what's stopping me from capturing it in an impressionist painting with colors ala Paul Cezanne? Pouring a hard day's work with both feet on the ground, at night I can still look-up at all the brilliant stars shining in the night sky in awe and wonder at all that majesty, right?

I am someone with a lot of education and several degrees. I amazes me that people look down on tradesmen and craftsmen. Jobs we used to call "a good day's work". Trade schools and amazingly important for the future of our country and people, and those that work the 'dirty jobs' are the backbone.

Judicious Aim
I became a plumber because that was the only trade that was hiring in 2009. I had learned auto & diesel mechanic trades because they paid well throughout the 90's. I enlisted in the service because I knew auto mechanic jobs were dead end jobs. I knew this because I worked in shops with very experienced men who were in their 40's and 50's who had been turning wrenches since they were teens. They made around $45k a year despite owning tens of thousands of dollars worth in tools that were needed to perform their jobs. They all told me it was not a career that would open doors so I raised my hand and earned my EGA at Parris Island.

After my time in the Marines as an aircraft mechanic I returned to the truck and equipment industry for several years largely because the aviation industry was not hiring. When trucking and construction dried up in 2009 I learned plumbing because "plumbers needed" were the only adverts I saw. There was a demand that was not being filled. Several years after I made that jump into plumbing I am the foreman for a plumbing shop with 20 employees under me.

My advice is to never look the other way when opportunity is staring at you. Most people cringe when I tell of how my day working on sewage grinder pumps went, but i love the $69k i earn while doing very dirty jobs. I remember the first time I had to work in a sewage pit and I remember thinking that I needed to suck it up (not literally) because there was no other work out there. Looking back I am glad I always chose the opportunity path instead of my dream of being a LEO. I make a good living fixing things.

This is actually Jewish wisdom. Don't follow your passion but find passion in what you do. Serve others, don't serve yourself. That's why Jewish people have been very successful in finance and science. They did what society needs them to do, not what they wanted to do. Prager University has a lot of hidden Jewish themes if you know what to look for. It's not bad, though, because it's best to learn from the best people, Jews. Jews are hated only because they are more successful than most white people.

iim Shifty
You could die tomorrow... follow what YOU want, stop letting other people choose for you, and stop giving up on yourselves, there's people in EVERY field that was told they weren't good enough and continued to believe in themselves, Steve jobs, Isaiah Thomas 5'9" NBA STAR! (29pts a game) like are you kidding me, and a lot of you ppl just say o well I guess this guy on YouTube is right I'm not good enough to follow my passion... BELIEVE IN YOURSELF!!!!!!!!

Darmil P
This video should be re-titled 'Don't follow your passion if you suck at it.'

Category: Education
License: Standard YouTube License


UFF Commentary on The Lottery of Life:

Congrats! We're all winners of The Lottery of Life! That is, we survived gestation and birth (be we full term or premies), our upbringing (in a loving family hopefully), education (without losing our child-like sense of wonder for the world, again, hopefully), food (haven't been poisoned, at least not yet), traffic (look both ways before crossing the street and drive carefully, please), friendships (lucky in love is a lottery in itself), work (loving what you do for a living transcends the "W" word beyond four letter connotations)... Lucky indeed, at least so far... Whew.

And how many of us buy lottery tickets and dream about winning yet think nothing about jay walking or running a red light when pressed for time without giving a thought to the odds of becoming an accident victim?

What are the odds of winning big? And what are the odds of losing your precious life through carelessness or fate, accidental or otherwise? Do you know or even think about it?

Psychologically, survival personalities are geared to focus on positive expectations yet we may be surprised with the following statistics...


24 Things That Are More Likely to Happen Than Winning the Lottery

by Kalen Bruce | Jul 24, 2014
Courtesy of:

Do you play the lottery?

Everyone knows the odds of winning the lottery are unlikely, but exactly how unlikely?
First off, I am talking about the major lotteries here.
Namely, The Powerball and Mega Millions. Heard of them?
The odds are similar for winning both. Around 1 in 176,000,000.
Not too bad, right? Oh wait, yes it is.
In fact, here are a total of 24 things that are more likely to happen than winning the lottery…

Dying Isn’t That Likely

You have heard that you are more like to die on the way to buy your lottery ticket than you are to win the lottery, right? The odds of you dying in a car accident are 1 in 6,700, by the way.
Dying isn’t really that likely, especially in some of these weird ways, but it’s still more likely than winning the lottery.

Here are 11 other ways you are more likely to die than win the lottery:

Being killed by a vending machine. (1 in 112 million)
Being killed in a terrorist attack on an airline. (1 in 25 million)
Dying from a bee, hornet or wasp sting. (1 in 6.1 million)
Dying from being left-handed and using a right-handed product incorrectly. (1 in 4.4 million)
Dying in a plane crash. (1 in 1 million)
Being killed by flesh-eating bacteria. (1 in 1 million)
Getting Struck by Lightning. (1 in 1 million)
Drowning (1 in 2,000,000)
Drowning specifically in a bathtub. (1 in 840,000)
Dying in an on-the-job accident. (1 in 48,000)
Being murdered…just in general. (1 in 18,000)

It’s pretty unlikely that any of that will happen to you and it’s definitely more unlikely that you will win the lottery. It’s not all bad though. There are actually good things… or at least, neat things, that are more likely to happen:

Getting attacked by a shark. (1 in 11.5 million)
Visiting the ER for a pogo stick related injury. (1 in 115,300)

Oh wait! I said good things… here you go:

Having identical quadruplets. (1 in 15 million)
Becoming US president. (1 in 10 million)
Becoming a Movie Star. (1 in 1,505,000)
Becoming an astronaut. (1 in 12,100,000)
Becoming a pro athlete. (1 in 22,000)
Winning an Olympic gold medal. (1 in 662,000)
Winning an academy award. (1 in 11,500)
Finding out your child is a genius. (1 to 250)
Dating a millionaire. (1 to 215)
Getting a royal flush in a first hand of poker. (1 in 649,740)

So if you want a safer investment than the lottery, try Vegas. Or try to find one of those millionaires.

With all of these odds, it’s hard to believe that anything is less likely than winning the lottery, but you would be surprised…

There is a better chance that you will win the lottery, than there is that these things will happen:

Getting a perfect NCAA bracket (1 in 9,223,372,036,854,775,808)
Shuffling a deck of cards into perfect, sequential order (1 in 10^68)
Being hit by a meteor (1 in 182,138,880,000,000)

I guess those are 3 things that aren’t worth trying…especially getting hit by a meteor. Don’t try that at home, kids.

Well, if someone offers a billion dollars for guessing the NCAA bracket, it doesn’t hurt to try.
I don’t have an issue with buying a lottery ticket here and there for fun. If you play all the time, you may want to re-read this article, but this was really just for fun, because it’s my birthday and fun is just what happens on your birthday.

You Exist! What Are the odds?

It’s important to know that you are less likely to exist than you are to win the lottery.
So that means you have already beat the odds by being here at all.
Good job!

The odds of you existing are 1 in 10^2,685,000.

UFF NOTE: For the full break down on the above odds regarding your existence, starting with one egg meeting one sperm, which together made you, GOTO Kalen's article at


Maddock Douglas Reverse Lottery

Published on Mar 21, 2013

Category: Entertainment
License: Standard YouTube License

By embedding YouTube videos on our site, we are agreeing to YouTube API Terms of Service.
This agreement extends to all YouTube entries posted on this site.


WARREN BUFFETT on being at the right place right time and luck with wealth

UFF Commentary:

White rich American male speaks the truth about the lottery of life.

Published on Feb 7, 2010

Category: Education
License: Standard YouTube License


UFF Suggests:

This planet is, hopefully, our Utopia, full of potential for humanity. We can correct our ways, share and grow, flora and fauna included. It's never too late. Each and every individual can make a contribution to the future of our collective, Earthly well-being!

Discuss/debate the above statement with meritocracy and luck in mind.


DISCLAIMER: UFF does not own any of the above works, nor do we claim responsibility or ownership for any images or audio tracks shown in these and other videos UFF has posted. All rights go to their respective owners.


UFF Commentary Notes are the sole responsibility of the President of UFF.

See post of November 29, 2017 for full transparency details.


Sapiens, A Brief History Of Humankind * The Book * Related Quotes, Humour, Music and Then Some...

Sapiens, A Brief History Of Humankind * The Book * Related Quotes, Humour, Music and Then Some...

Sapiens, a Brief History of Humankind, is a treasure trove of insights on how the human condition manifests over time and circumstance.

For those who seek cogent research and commentary on the impact of biology, environmental realities, evolving human cultures including social/political/economic considerations and more, this is a must read/study/discuss book.

Here are some details regarding the author:

Yuval Noah Harari
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yuval Noah Harari (Hebrew: יובל נח הררי‎; born 24 February 1976) is an Israeli historian and a tenured professor in the Department of History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.[1] He is the author of the international bestsellers Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind (2014) and Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow (2015). His writings examine concepts of free will, consciousness and definitions of intelligence.
Harari's early publications are concerned with what he describes as the "cognitive revolution" occurring roughly 50,000 years ago, when homo sapiens supplanted the rival Neanderthals, mastered cognitive linguistics, developed structured societies, and ascended as apex predators, aided by the agricultural revolution and more recently accelerated by scientific methodology and rationale which have allowed humans to approach near mastery over their environment.
His recent books are more cautionary, and work through the consequences of a futuristic biotechnological world where sentient biological organisms are surpassed by their own creations; he has said "Homo sapiens as we know them will disappear in a century or so".[2][3]

Homo sapiens interests

Harari is interested in how Homo sapiens reached their current condition, and in their future. His research focuses on macro-historical questions such as: What is the relation between history and biology? What is the essential difference between Homo sapiens and other animals? Is there justice in history? Does history have a direction? Did people become happier as history unfolded?
Harari regards dissatisfaction as the "deep root" of human reality, and as related to evolution.[20]
In a 2017 article Harari has argued that through continuing technological progress and advances in the field of artificial intelligence "by 2050 a new class of people might emerge – the useless class. People who are not just unemployed, but unemployable."[21] He put forward the case that dealing with this new social class economically, socially and politically will be a central challenge for humanity in the coming decades.[22]

Animal welfare

Harari has commented on the plight of animals, particularly domesticated animals since the agricultural revolution, and is a vegan.[5] In a 2015 Guardian article under the title "Industrial farming is one of the worst crimes in history" he called "[t]he fate of industrially farmed animals (...) one of the most pressing ethical questions of our time."[23]

See Wikipedia site for footnote details and further notes regarding his career, personal life, other writings...


Here below are excerpts from Sapiens the book intended to whet the appetite for further reading.

"Sapiens" Quotes:

All quotes courtesy of the book: "Sapiens, a Brief History of Humankind" by Yuval Noah Harari, copyright 2014

"About 13.5 billion years ago, matter, energy, time and space came into being in what is known as the Big Bang. The story of these fundamental features of our universe is called physics.
About 300,000 years after their appearance, matter and energy started to coalesce into complex structures, called atoms, which then combined into molecules. The story of atoms, molecules and their interactions is called chemistry.
About 3.8 billion years ago, on a planet called Earth, certain molecules combined to form particularly large and intricate structures called organisms. The history of organisms is called biology.
About 70,000 years ago, organisms belonging to the specie Homo Sapiens started to form even more elaborate structures called cultures. The subsequent development of these human cultures is called history.
Three important revolutions shaped the course of history: the Cognitive Revolution kick-started history about 70,000 years ago. The Agricultural Revolution sped it up about 12,000 years ago. The Scientific Revolution, which got under way only 500 years ago, may well end history and start something completely different. This book tells the story of how these three revolutions have effected humans and their fellow organisms."
From Part One, The Cognitive Revolution
1 An Animal of No Significance, page 4

"Here and there a Luddite hold out refuses to open an e-mail account, just as thousands of years ago some human bands refused to take up farming and so escaped the luxury trap. But the Agricultural Revolution did not need every band in a given region to join up. It only took one. Once one band settled down and started tilling, whether in the Middle East or Central America, agriculture was irresistible. Since farming created the conditions for swift demographic growth, farmers could usually overcome foragers by sheer weight of numbers. The foragers could either run away, abandoning their hunting grounds to field and pasture, or take up the ploughshare themselves. Either way, the old life was doomed."
From Part Two, The Agricultural Revolution
5 History's Biggest Fraud, page 88

"No matter what you call it - game theory, post modernism or memetics - the dynamics of history are not directed towards enhancing human well-being. There is no basis for thinking that the most successful cultures in history are necessarily the best ones for Homo Sapiens. Like evolution, history disregards the happiness of individual organisms. And individual humans, for their part, are usually far too ignorant and weak to influence the course of history to their own advantage."
From Part Three, The Unification of Humankind
13 The Secret of Success, page 243-4

"The only thing we can try to do is to influence the direction scientists are taking. Since we might soon be able to engineer our desires too, perhaps the real question facing us is not 'What do we want to become?', but 'What do we want to want?' Those who are not spooked by this question probably haven't given it enough thought."
From Part Four, The Scientific Revolution
20 The End of Homo Sapiens, page 414


Sapien Humour:

Human Zoo Prank

Just For Laughs Gags
Published on May 16, 2011

Evil little kid cages human beings, by tricking them into picking up his soccer ball. He puts them on display in a zoo as the Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Then some Asian tourists show up and take photos, not understanding that the people are actually trapped. Things get even weirder when vacationing gorillas show up to have a look at this wonderful human being exhibit in it's natural habitat.


Buff Dudes
Published on Dec 28, 2015

The Gym. Millions of homo sapiens frequent this urban wilderness. Today we will take a look into this strange place and show you the gym like you've never seen it before.

CAUTION: Below entry is red neck humour that some may find distasteful.

Archie Bunker's Take on Revenge, Vigilantes and Homo Sapiens

Published on Feb 27, 2014


Thematic Music:

Laurie Anderson - O Superman [Official Music Video]

Nonesuch Records
Published on May 20, 2016

Category: Music
License: Standard YouTube License

Rag'n'Bone Man - Human (Official Video)

Published on Jul 21, 2016

Category: Music
License: Standard YouTube License

Marc Bolan & T.Rex Perform 'Children Of The Revolution' From Born To Boogie

Published on Jun 1, 2016

In the Apple Studios section of the “Born To Boogie” film, Marc Bolan and T. Rex are joined by Ringo Starr on drums and Elton John on piano. Together they perform exclusive versions of the then-unreleased song “Children Of The Revolution”.

Born To Boogie is Available in multiple formats.

Category: Music
License: Standard YouTube License

Sade - Why can't we live Together ? - Montreux Jazz Festival ( 1984 )

Published on Mar 17, 2011

Category: Music
License: Standard YouTube License

Roberta Flack - First Time Ever I Saw Your Face 1972

Published on Jul 2, 2010

Category: Music
License: Standard YouTube License


As a reminder of our biological heritage, here's an animated depiction of the morphing image of the human face.

Human face evolution in the last 6 million years

News Satellite
Published on Oct 30, 2015

A depiction that human face has undergone significant evolution within the last 6 million years.

Category : News & Politics
License : Standard YouTube License
Created using : YouTube Video Editor


On Social Distancing:

Time jump to a not too distant future and consider the following -

A family of sentient biological organisms just moved in next door. Would you:

Put your house up for sale.
Meet and greet.
Invite them over for supper.
Let them stay overnight when their house is damaged by fire.
Let your children stay with them while you're on a weekend get away.
Be God parents to their next child.
Caution your daughter on dating their son.
Adopt one of their children when both parents are killed (or is it destroyed?) in a plane crash.

Discuss, all things considered, including whether sentient biological organisms would be harbingers of a Utopian or Dystopian epoch...


noun: harbinger; plural noun: harbingers
a person or thing that announces or signals the approach of another.
"witch hazels are the harbingers of spring"
herald, sign, indication, signal, portent, omen, augury, forewarning, presage; More
forerunner, precursor, messenger;
"I long to see the robins, crocuses, and other harbingers of spring"
a forerunner of something.
"these works were not yet opera, but they were the most important harbinger of opera"

noun: epoch; plural noun: epochs
a period of time in history or a person's life, typically one marked by notable events or particular characteristics.
"the Victorian epoch"
era, age, period, time, span, stage; eon
"England's Tudor epoch"
the beginning of a distinctive period in the history of someone or something.
"welfare reform was an epoch in the history of U.S. social policy"
era, age, period, time, span, stage; eon
"England's Tudor epoch"
a division of time that is a subdivision of a period and is itself subdivided into ages, corresponding to a series in chronostratigraphy.
"the Pliocene epoch"
era, age, period, time, span, stage; eon
"England's Tudor epoch"


NOTE: March 15 was a religious holiday during the Roman Empire, with the actual date based on the Gregorian calendar. Last year, 2017, this year and next, The Ides Of March falls on March 15.

History of The Ides of March

The Ides Of March refers to how the Romans kept track of the days in a month, which is quite different from how we do it. While we count the days sequentially from the first day all the way to the last day, the Romans used a different system. They counted backward from three fixed points of the month. For instance, the Nones usually fell on the 7th, the Ides on the 15th and the Kalends was the beginning of the month.

This day was also considered a day that was sacred to the deity Jupiter and the Romans would sacrifice a sheep to Jupiter. The Ides of March also marked the beginning of several religious festivals – most notably the festivals of Cybele and Attis. However, after Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC, this day would forever be remembered for that and not those religious holidays.

Want to know more? Visit the below site -


DISCLAIMER: UFF does not own any of the above works, nor do we claim responsibility or ownership for any images or audio tracks shown in these and other videos UFF has posted. All rights go to their respective owners.


UFF Commentary Notes are the sole responsibility of the President of UFF.

See post of November 29, 2017 for full transparency details.


New Year Special * The 8 Biggest Happiness Findings of 2017 * Here's How 10 New Year's Eve Traditions Got Started * New Year Quotes, Humour, Music

New Year Special * The 8 Biggest Happiness Findings of 2017 * Here's How 10 New Year's Eve Traditions Got Started * New Year Quotes, Humour, Music

Happy New Year!

Enjoy! Utopian health, happiness and well being to one and all!


The 8 Biggest Happiness Findings of 2017

By Rachael Rettner, Senior Writer | December 29, 2017 07:00am ET
Courtesy of:

Don't Worry, Be Happy

There's no single formula for happiness. But scientists continue to investigate aspects of our lives that may affect our well-being, including social media use, exercise and even our posture.

Here are eight interesting things we learned in 2017 about the factors that may influence happiness and lower your odds of stress and depression.

1. How Sharing Can Make Kids Happy

For young children, sharing can bring happiness, but only if they do it voluntarily, a study from China suggests.

The study looked at groups of 3- and 5-year-olds who were either pressured to share objects — in this case, stickers — or were given the opportunity to share voluntarily.

The researchers found, judging by facial expressions, that the kids were happier when they shared voluntarily, compared with when they kept the stickers for themselves. In contrast, the kids did not experience the same happiness boost when they were pressured to share.

The study suggested that children can experience a positive mood when they share voluntarily, which may lead to further sharing, the researchers said.

2. Meditation Could Lower The Body's Stress Signals

Practicing meditation could help your body handle stress better.

In one study, people with anxiety disorder who took a course in mindfulness meditation showed reduced levels of stress hormones and markers of inflammation during a stressful event, compared with how their bodies reacted before taking the meditation course. In contrast, participants who did not learn mindfulness meditation, but instead took a course in stress management, did not show similar reductions in the same measures during a stressful event.

Mindfulness meditation helps people learn to focus on the present moment, and accept difficult thoughts or feelings.

The study findings suggest that mindfulness meditation "may be a helpful strategy to decrease biological stress reactivity" in people with anxiety disorder, the researchers wrote in their study, which was published Jan. 24 in the journal Psychiatry Research.

3. Exercise May Boost Your Mood

Even a little exercise may help combat symptoms of depression..

The study analyzed information from nearly 34,000 Norwegian adults, who were asked about their level of exercise as well as their symptoms of depression, and were followed for 11 years.

The study found that people who said that they never exercised at all at the beginning of the study were 44 percent more likely to develop depression, compared with those who said they exercised 1 to 2 hours per week.

The researchers estimated that, if all participants had exercised for at least 1 hour a week, 12 percent of cases of depression could have been prevented.

The researchers conclude that modest changes in a population's level of exercise could have substantial mental health benefits.

The study was published Oct. 3 in the American Journal of Psychiatry.

4. Hawaii Is The Happiest State … Again

Could moving to Hawaii make you happier? Residents of the Aloha State certainly seem to know a thing or two about happiness — Hawaii frequently tops the list of happiest U.S. states in an annual poll.

Residents of Hawaii scored highest on Gallup-Healthways' annual survey of well-being in 2016, with a score of 65.2 out of 100. The results for the 2016 survey were released in February 2017. These results marked the sixth time that Hawaii has come out on top in the poll since Gallup-Healthways began conducting it in 2008.

The rankings are based on interviews with more than 177,000 U.S. adults in all 50 states. The researchers calculated a well-being score for each state, based on participants' answers to questions about different aspects of well-being, including their sense of purpose, social relationships, financial lives, community involvement and physical health.

5. Swipe Right? Tinder Could Hurt Self-esteem

Online dating apps aim to boost your love life, but the process may take a toll on your mental health, early research suggests.

In a recent study, researchers analyzed information from more than 800 college-age students who either used the online dating app Tinder.

The study found that Tinder users were more likely than nonusers to report negative feelings, such as feeling pressure to look a certain way, or experiencing negative moods.

Still, this doesn't mean you have to get off Tinder. To curb possible negative effects from online dating, the researchers recommend that people do not use Tinder as a means of self-validation — in other words, you shouldn't judge yourself by the number of matches you get. Users should also keep in mind that the photos they see of others are often selected to show a person at their very best, rather than in their day-to-day life.

The study was presented Aug. 3 at the American Psychological Association's annual meeting.

6. Tip For A Better Mood: Sit Up Straight

Simply sitting up straight may improve your mood, at least over the short term, a preliminary study from New Zealand suggests.

The study involved 61 people whose scores on a survey indicated that they had mild to moderate symptoms of depression. About half of the participants received instructions on how to adopt a good posture (sitting up straight), and the researchers also applied sports tape to the participants' backs in a manner that's been shown to improve posture. The other half of the participants were not given any instructions about posture, and had a few pieces of tape applied to their backs in a random manner.

The participants were then asked to fill out a survey about their mood. The results showed that people in the upright-posture group reported feeling more enthusiastic, more excited and stronger and less fatigued than the people in the regular-posture group.

Future work is needed to investigate the long-term effects of posture changes on mood, and whether adopting an upright posture could actually aid in treating depression, the researchers said.

The study was published in the March 2017 issue of the Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry.

7. Sleep Troubles May Affect Depression Risk

Trouble sleeping is often thought of as a symptom of other mental health conditions, such as depression and anxiety. But recent research suggests that lack of sleep itself may actually contribute to these mental health conditions. What's more, the findings suggest that improving sleep could aid in easing depression and anxiety.

The study involved more than 3,700 college students in the United Kingdom who had insomnia. Participants answered questions about their sleep and other mental health conditions at the beginning of the study and after a 10-week treatment for insomnia called cognitive behavioral therapy.

The study found that those who received the insomnia treatment had decreased levels of depression and anxiety, and improved psychological well-being, compared with those who didn't receive the treatment.

"For many people, insomnia can be part of the complex package of causes of mental health difficulties," the researchers said. The findings suggest that doctors who treat mental health conditions should give a higher priority to treating sleep difficulties than they currently do, the researchers said.

The study was published Sept. 6 in the journal The Lancet Psychiatry.

8. Too Much Facebook May Harm Mental Health

Many people jokingly lament that they spend "too much time on Facebook." But could overdoing it on the "likes" actually harm your mental and physical health?

A recent study suggests it might. The study, which analyzed Facebook data from more than 5,200 people, found that more activity on Facebook was linked with reduced well-being. For example, people who reported "liking" a lot of things on Facebook, or who updated their status more often, tended to report having worse mental health, than those who liked fewer things on Facebook or updated their status less often.

Although it's possible that people with worse mental health may seek solace in Facebook, the results held even after the researchers took into account people's reports of mental health at the beginning of the study, and their number of "real-world" friendships.

The findings suggest that, in some cases, Facebook use may be contributing to reduced well-being. Individual social media users might do well to curtail their use of social media and focus instead on real-world relationships," the researchers concluded.

Still, not all studies have found detriments to Facebook use, so some experts recommend that, until further research is conducted, people use social media sites in moderation.


Here's How 10 New Year's Eve Traditions Got Started

By Tia Ghose, Associate Editor | December 30, 2017 03:30am ET
Courtesy of and thanks again to:


Editor’s Note: This article was updated on Dec. 30, 2017
Whether you’re celebrating in New York City or Nashville, Tennessee, New Year’s Eve follows a pretty similar script: People dress up in their best duds, break out the bubbly and sing "Auld Lang Syne" at the stroke of midnight. If it’s a particularly rowdy party, some things may explode.

But how exactly did these traditions arise?

Many of these rituals have ancient roots and are similar around the world. It turns out that many are designed to ward off evil spirits as we enter the darkest time of the year, said Anthony Aveni, an astronomer and anthropologist at Colgate University in New York, and the author of "The Book of the Year: A Brief History of Our Seasonal Holidays," (Oxford University Press, 2004).

"This is a transitional period," Aveni told Live Science. "I’m looking at my window at all the snow. The worst of it is just beginning because it’s winter. The sun goes away, and when the sun goes away we have to get it back; we have all these rituals designed to get the sun back."

From popping open a bottle of champagne to watching the ball drop in Times Square, here are the roots of 10 New Year’s Eve traditions.

1. Smooch Your Sweetie

Puckering up at the stroke of midnight is a venerable tradition with ancient roots. Many cultures considered the transition from the warm to the cold seasons to be an intensely vulnerable time, when evil spirits could run amok, Aveni said.

Many of our traditions, including kissing, originally come from the English tradition of "saining," or offering blessing or protection, during the period of Yuletide, Aveni said. (Yuletide was originally a pre-Christian Germanic festival that eventually became synonymous with Christmastide in Europe.)

Kissing, in this context, was thought to bring good luck as people entered the vulnerable, transitional period of the new year, Aveni said.

"You want to be closest to those who support you," Aveni told Live Science.

2. Bubbly Luxury

Popping champagne corks at the stroke of midnight is a mainstay on New Year’s Eve, whether at swanky parties or home celebrations. In general, overindulgence and excess are hallmarks of New Year’s celebrations around the world, Aveni said.

But when exactly did the peach-colored, bubbly beverage become synonymous with New Year’s Eve?

Despite its French name, champagne’s signature fizz traces its origins back to England in the 1500s, according to "Wine Science: Principles and Applications" (Academic Press, 2008), Live Science previously reported. [Champagne Facts for the New Year (Infographic)]

At that point, people figured out how to create bubbly bottled drinks. In 1662, Christopher Merret reported to the Royal Society of London that adding sugar to bottled wine created a fizzy beverage, thanks to the yeast in the wine, which consumed the sugar to produce carbon dioxide. It took about a century to perfect the fermentation technique, however, according to Imbibe Magazine.

The use of champagne for celebrations has its roots in the Christian ritual of consuming wine during the Eucharist as the blood of Christ. In A.D. 496, a wine from the Champagne region of France was used in the baptism of the Frankish warrior Clovis, according to, a website run by the Champagne Committee of France. From then on, wines from the Champagne region were often used at such religious events as consecrations, and at coronations and soirees, according to the website.

"After the French Revolution, it became a part of the secular rituals that replaced formerly religious rituals," Kolleen Guy, associate professor of history at the University of Texas at San Antonio and author of "When Champagne Became French" (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003), previously told Live Science. "You could 'christen a ship' without a priest, for example, by using the 'holy water' of champagne," Guy said.

By 1789, the French had taken the two elements — the bubbles and their prized Champagne-region wine — and put the two together for royal parties and celebrations. Champagne, however, didn’t become the ultimate New Year’s celebration beverage until producers of champagne tried to link the bubbly to festive occasions with family, and the rise of the middle class increased the purchasing power of ordinary people, according to Imbibe Magazine.

3. "Auld Lang Syne"

Another classic tradition is to sing "Auld Lang Syne," a Scottish poem that was recorded on paper officially in 1788 by the Scottish poet Robert Burns, according to The melody itself, however, is a much older folk song that was known in Scotland, and the Scottish Museum set Burns’ words to the tune when he sent it in, according to the English Folk Dance and Song Society.

"There is an old song and tune which has often thrilled through my soul," Burns said in reference to the popular melody in his 1788 letter, according to the Burns encyclopedia.

Burns admitted to drawing inspiration for "Auld Lang Syne" from an old man he heard singing the song, and other variants of the song had appeared earlier in the 1700s.

In English, the literal translation of Auld Lang Syne is "old long times," but it means something more along the lines of "once upon a time." With its touch of nostalgia, it soon became a mainstay at British and Scottish funerals, farewells and group celebrations. It didn’t make it across the pond as a New Year's tradition until 1929, however, when the Guy Lombardo orchestra played it at a hotel in New York, Live Science previously reported.

4. Dropping The Ball

At the stroke of midnight, revelers in Times Square will watch the giant ball drop in New York City. But where exactly did this tradition come from? In the old days, sailors used "time balls" to set their own timepieces while at sea. They would set these chronometers by using a spyglass to scan the harbor, looking for balls that were dropped into the water at certain times, reported. The first time ball, which was installed in Portsmouth, England, made its first drop in 1829, and by 1845, Washington, D.C., had one installed as well, according to

By 1904, a big ball was present when revelers began partying in Times Square. But the first version of the ball — a wooden and iron orb that was adorned with 100 25-watt lightbulbs — dropped in 1907, according to the Times Square Alliance. That year, The New York Times publisher Adolph Ochs was hoping to find a replacement for the fireworks that had been banned by the police. (Hot ashes from the fireworks fell into the streets after the fireworks were deployed the year prior, according to Ochs asked his chief electrician to conceive of an equally sparkly alternative — and the time ball was born.

Since the first ball drop, there have been seven balls, according to the Times Square Alliance. The current ball weighs 6 tons (5.4 metric tons), is 12 feet (3.65 meters) in diameter and gets its bling from 2,688 Waterford Crystal triangles and 32,256 LED lights, according to the alliance.

Balls aren’t the only things that drop on New Year’s Eve. In Port Clinton, Ohio, residents watch a 600-lb. walleye fish replica fall, while Boise, Idaho, famous for its potatoes, drops a glowing "GlowTato," WNYC reported.

5. New Year's Resolution

Messing up and promising to do better next time may be a uniquely human instinct that has no season, but making New Year’s resolutions dates back at least to the time of the ancient Mesopotamians. In Ancient Babylonia, citizens made spoken resolutions in March, during their 12-day-long New Year Festival, called Akitu, Live Science previously reported. The resolutions were not undertaken for mere self-improvement: They required making an oath to the sitting (or new) king, and were considered essential to keep the kingdom in the gods’ favor.

The Romans also had a tradition of swearing an oath of loyalty to the emperor in March, when their New Year started. Although this Roman tradition didn’t directly translate to New Year’s resolutions, by the 1740s, the Methodist church had a practice of holding renewal services on Dec. 31. The services offer people a chance to look back at the year that passed and renew their commitment to God, Live Science reported.

In general, the act of making resolutions becomes the necessary, purifying ritual that follows the overindulgence of the new year, Aveni said. On Dec. 31, everybody is going to eat and drink to excess, "and then the next day you’ll wake up and hopefully you’ll have your resolutions to do the next year better."

6. Letting Sparks Fly

Do people ever need an excuse to make things go boom?

From China to Australia, people ring in the new year with noisemakers, sparklers and fireworks. But how did the tradition of ringing in the new year with a flash of light and a bang start?

It all comes back to the danger lurking in this transitional period, Aveni said.

In cultures around the world, people bang drums, light firecrackers and even beat the corners of their room to spook the spooky creatures lurking in the night.

"Anything to chase away the evil spirits," Aveni said.

Fireworks, for instance, were invented in the seventh century A.D. in China, and one of the express purposes of fireworks was to ward off evil spirits. From the beginning, the Chinese New Year was a reliable time to see the sparkling displays. Yet the tradition of setting off fireworks in the Western world seems to have evolved independently, Aveni said.

7. Superstitions Abound

New Year's traditions around the world often come with a heavy dose of superstition.
For instance, in Brazil some avoid eating chicken in the first few minutes of the new year.

Why? Because chickens scratch the Earth backwards, consuming poultry would mean going backwards in life, rather than forward, the Rio Times reported. To avoid that fate, people eat foods that move forward, such as fish and pork. Italians, meanwhile, are supposed to reserve some of their wine grapes from the harvest to consume on New Year's Eve, which will mean they'll be frugal and financially savvy, according to Italy Magazine.

But why is the New Year so steeped in superstitious rituals? It turns out that rituals act as a buffer against anxiety and uncertainty, and what could be more uncertain than the future year, with all the events yet to come? New Year's and other holiday rituals ease that anxiety by making the world seem more predictable, according to Dimitris Xygalatas, Assistant Professor in Anthropology at the University of Connecticut

8. Scary Start

While most New Year's traditions are cheerful affairs, others are downright frightening.

In the Japanese village of Oga, on New Year's Eve men dress in grass masks and embody the Namahage, demonic figures who go door to door searching for new members of the community. After screaming at the children and new family members to be obedient, and to study and work hard, the more established members defend the newcomers and youngsters to the demon, who leaves the house, according to the Namahage Museum.

Meanwhile in Peru, an Andean "fight club" on Christmas Day allows people to kick and punch each other to resolve differences, so they can start the New Year with a clean slate — and some black eyes, according to " A Christmas Cornucopia: The Hidden Stories Behind Our Yuletide Traditions," (Penguin, 2016).

9. Money, Money, Money

Whether it's eating pork or leftover grapes, or hopping on one foot — a huge number of New Year's traditions are all about the Benjamins — or Lira or Euros. Prosperity looms large in the roots of many New Year's traditions.

The Turks, for instance, wear red underwear, run the faucet and sprinkle salt on their doorsteps to ensure prosperity, according to the Daily Sabah, while the Swiss will drop rich dollops of whipped cream to the floor and leave them there to usher in riches, according to the Farmer's Almanac. Filipinos, meanwhile, will wear polka dots, because the rotund shape of the circles symbolizes prosperity.

People in the south, meanwhile, eat black eyed peas, collard greens and cornbread because they resemble coins, dollar bills and shiny gold, respectively.

10. Traditions Around The World

While there are some commonalities across the world, almost every culture has its unique take on the new year.

For instance, in Mexico, people may eat one grape for every chime of the church bells at midnight, Aveni said.

Aztecs used to burn all of their mats during the new year, as fire was considered cleansing. They would then take the clean, new fire to their homes to light their hearths, Aveni said.

The English have a tradition of leaving money out on their porch to be purified, taking the cleaned, new money into their house on the new year.

Meanwhile, in Scotland, the tradition of the "first footing" says that, for good luck, the first person to set foot in the house after the stroke of midnight should be a tall, dark male bearing a lump of coal, shortbread, salt, a black bun and a "wee dram" of whisky, according to the History and Heritage Accommodation Guide of the UK.

Editor's Note: This article was originally published on Dec. 29, 2016 and was updated on Dec. 30, 2017 to include additional information on New Year's traditions in other countries.


New Year Quotes:
Read more at:

The new year stands before us, like a chapter in a book, waiting to be written. We can help write that story by setting goals.
Melody Beattie

Write it on your heart that every day is the best day in the year.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

I hope that in this year to come, you make mistakes. Because if you are making mistakes, then you are making new things, trying new things, learning, living, pushing yourself, changing yourself, changing your world. You're doing things you've never done before, and more importantly, you're doing something.
Neil Gaiman

If you asked me for my New Year Resolution, it would be to find out who I am.
Cyril Cusack

Only dreams give birth to change.
Sarah Ban Breathnach

To have the kind of year you want to have, something has to happen that you can't explain why it happened. Something has to happen that you can't coach.
Bobby Bowden

Ring out the false, ring in the true.
Alfred Lord Tennyson


New Year Humour:

Posts are OK for kids as per parental discraetion.

Kid President AWESOME YEAR Challenge!

Published on Jan 3, 2013

Category: Entertainment
License: Standard YouTube License

10 New Year's Resolutions As Told by Cats So Funny

Guy Hughes
Published on Jan 2, 2014

Category: People & Blogs
License: Standard YouTube License


Honest New Year's

Published on Dec 29, 2016

It's almost as if New Year's Eve consistently fails to live up to our collective expectations.

Category: Comedy
License: Standard YouTube License

My New Year’s Resolution is to Get My "D" Out of this Toaster (Hardly Working)

CAUTION: "D" word in use! Yes, the four letter "D" word! No, not door.

Published on Jan 1, 2015

This year, I'm FINALLY going to do it.

Category: Comedy
License: Standard YouTube License

Jingle "B"'S (Merry Christmas Happy New Year Message) VERY, VERY FUNNY!

CAUTION: "B"'s being played! Well, yes, it's bells, sort of...

Glenn Jackson
Published on Dec 14, 2014

A fun way to have your Jingle "B"'s rung!

Category: Film & Animation
License: Standard YouTube License


New Year Dance Music:

This is but one selection of many available. Enjoy and/or explore options!

New Year Mix 2018 / Best Trap / Bass / EDM Music Mashup & Remixes

Magic Music
Published on Dec 29, 2017

New Year Mix 2018 / Best Trap / Bass / EDM Music Mashup & Remixes

Category: Music
License: Standard YouTube License


So, what will UFF say and do about the four letter "C" word in 2018?

Stay tuned.

BTW: The 4 letter "C" word in question is CARE.


DISCLAIMER: UFF does not own any of the above works, nor do we claim responsibility or ownership for any images or audio tracks shown in these and other videos UFF has posted. All rights go to their respective owners.


UFF Commentary Notes are the sole responsibility of the President of UFF.

See post of November 29, 2017 for full transparency details.